MotoGP »

Future MotoGP rule changes revealed.

On Saturday at Jerez, the FIM and Dorna gave a further update on the MotoGP rule changes, aimed at cutting costs during the 2009 and 2010 seasons.

In mid-February, in response to the withdraw of Kawasaki and growing pressure on the remaining MotoGP manufacturers to reduce costs, the Grand Prix Commission announced six immediate rule changes for the 2009 season.

Those changes, which were aimed at lowering maintenance and running costs, consisted of: The removal of Friday morning practice whilst reducing the three remaining sessions from one hour to 45 minutes; a maximum of 5 engines for the final 8 races; banning of ceramic composite brakes; banning of launch control; banning of electronic suspension and only two post-race tests during the season.

Further rule changes were then to be discussed for the 2010 season.

Those 2010 rule changes - plus an update on the 2009 restrictions - were duly announced by FIM president Vito Ippolito during a press conference at the final MotoGP pre-season test:

“The first change is about the use of the engines, as you know,” said Ippolito. “Now a rider can use five engines for the final seven races [after the cancellation of Hungary], from Brno to Valencia of this year. A rider can then use six engines for the whole of next year, 2010.

“The teams and manufacturers also agreed to reduce the tests. This year and next year we will have only eight days of testing.

“For the next season, 2010, we have also some important changes. The first of them is that we will have only one machine [per rider, meaning no spare bike] during each MotoGP event, from two machines that are allowed now.

“For next year we will also change some regulations for entry into the MotoGP class; new riders will not be allowed to participate in a factory team. The new riders from 250cc class or Moto2 or any other championship arriving to MotoGP will be allowed to participate only in private or satellite teams.

“In Moto2, there is a proposal coming from the manufacturers to have one make engine regulation. That means that we will have [only] one engine brand in Moto2 class.”

The penalty for breaking the MotoGP engine change rule will be a loss of 10 points.


Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Rainbow over a stormy paddock, Jerez MotoGP tests 2009
Rossi at 2016 Monza Rally Show (Monster)
Marquez at FIM Gala
VD Mark, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Smith crash, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Smith crash, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Smith crash, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Smith crash, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Smith, Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Sam Lowes, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Sam Lowes, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Redding, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Pirro, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016
Petrucci, Jerez WSBK/MotoGP tests.November 2016

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


Unimpressed - Unregistered

March 29, 2009 12:52 PM

This could ruin the sport. Rather than being about exciting racing and rider talent, where risk-taking and finding the limits is an integral part, it will all depend on 'playing it safe' - both mechanically for the manufacturers, the engineers and and racing strategy too. Who wants that ?!?!

squired - Unregistered

March 29, 2009 11:16 AM

I am all for the need to reduce costs but at the expense of what? Motogp is supposed to be the cutting edge of technology but now will be more like SBK. As for no second bike, what does this achieve? Teams will have more than enough parts to build a second bike so how much will be actually saved? Also if a rider crashes on his 1st lap in qualifying will he not be able to race? It is us the paying public who will suffer. Not only have they removed one practice session but reduced the time of the remaining ones, now with only one bike we will not get the chance to see the riders on track but still pay the same if not a higher entrance fee.This is an ill thought through knee jerk reaction!



© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.