You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
I'm against anything that takes away from the riders abilities to win races or the craftiness of the manufacturers to build a competitive bike. This is why I deplore the idea of having multiple tire manufacturers in MotoGP. Have we forgotten what happened in 2007 when nobody on Michelins had a chance? Don't you recall how Tech 3 were permanent back markers on the Dunlops? Seriously, we don't need a tire competition in MotoGP. It only benefits tire manufacturers and single tire rule is the way to go.
Now obviously, the tires MUST be SAFE and there MUST be NO favoritism--problems which ARE NOT a product of a single tire rule. These same problems exist with multiple manufacturers. Please don't attribute them to the single tire rule.