You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive.
An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the
comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right
of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary.
This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
Further breaking down your previous assessment of Spies and his merely fortunate results, that were only due to his weight. How do you explain Indianapolis 2011? The track temperature was high, nearly entire field had problems with tire degradation, and yet Spies finished the race with tires that looked like new, as did Stoner. Would his weight have not pushed the tires into the pavement, more than that of the lighter riders, and therefor advance his tire degradation? It certainly worked against Marco Simoncelli, a larger rider, whose tires were worn to the point that he nearly finished dead last of those running at the conclusion. So please explain what divine intervention occurred in that situation? Once again, your tidy little theory does not quite fit, does it?