You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
So we're talking the six completed championship years from 2006 to 2011?
Let's look at the facts, then cast our opinions.
Two championships apiece.
33 wins to Stoner, 26 wins to Rossi (if those figures aren't exact, they're close).
Rossi on a premium bike for 5 years (2006 to 2010).
Stoner on a premium bike for 2 years (2007 and 2011. imo 2007 is a stretch as the next best Duke was 7th and I doubt any other rider could have ridden that bike to the championship, but, what the hell, let's not quibble).
That's the facts. Now for the opinions...
Rossi over-achieved? On a premium bike for 5 of the 6 years. Hard to make a case for over-achievement.
Stoner under-achieved? On a premium bike for 2 years, won the championship in each of those years. On a satellite bike in 2006, on a POS Duke for an additional 3 years from 2008 to 2010. Hard to make a case for under-achievement.