You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
no you are blinded by yellow. its clearly obvious for all to see.
rossi won in 2009, fair play. his main contendors were a guy in his second year in the premier class and another guy on a ducati.
stoner won the title in his second season against a 5 times gp champ whilst riding a ducati. he then won his second title on the honda which was a new bike to him (the bike that another alien has never come close to doing) agaisnt the now experienced defending champion.
lorenzo won his title against stoner (need we say more, albeit on a ducati) but also against a 7 times world champion.
so as said, rossi won his 2008 title agaisnt a rookie and stoner (albeit it on a ducati), and in 2009 he won agaisnt the ducati and the inexperienced lorenzo in jiust his second season.
although all titles are deserved, it doesnt take a genious to realise who were 'more deserving' than others given the competitors, the experience and the machinary they were on at the time, but more importatnyl, who t