You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive.
An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the
comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right
of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary.
This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
On one hand the Ducati is supposed to be rubbish. Yet Stoner is rubbish for not winning two years in a row when riding it? On one hand Rossi is better than Stoner because he has more world championships and it doesn't matter that Stoner has won head to head. On the other hand Lorenzo is better than Stoner because he has beat him head to head. On one hand Stoner has only ever won because he had the superior bike. On the other hand Rossi managed to win nine championships with inferior bikes. On one hand Stoner is a one lap wonder. On the other hand he led 246 laps to Lorenzo's 116 last year. He has led more laps this year than Pedrosa despite having 3 weeks off and being injured. I am confused!