You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
Objectively speaking, it is a bit short-sighted to say that Rossi was a bad investment. None of us know the intricacies of the political red-tape Rossi was dealing with when it came to development, but what WE DO KNOW (..if we are to believe what has been reported by various media outlets AND substantiated by Prezi, Furusawa, etc.) is that Ducati recognized that the problem lies from within. Sure, the rider can and should take some of the blame, but "how much would be considered fair?" That is a quantity that is almost impossible to pinpoint. Rossi was brought in to do a job (aid in development)...and it was a failed marriage....but without the tools, how are you supposed to do your job as effectively as expected? It was pointless to hire him and waste the entire 2011 season because of stubbornness.