You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
What a strange post you just made.
No im not using the average percentage stat to say someone is better.
Im simply saying that head to head, Rossi has been beaten by Lorenzo and Stoner.
You cannot compare 2 riders from 2 different era's like you chose to do. You can only compare their ability against one another whilst they have been racing together.
For example, no one will EVER be able to say that Rossi is better than Ago, or that Ago was better than Rossi because they never raced together. To say one way of the other is pure speculation and opinions.
We can only use the data and stats that we know for sure, during the time they specnt on track together.
And there is no getting away from the fact that both Stoner and Lorenzo have better stats than Rossi.
So all im saying is that to say that Rossi is better than those two guys who he has been bettered by on track, is pure madness.