You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive.
An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the
comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right
of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary.
This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
Rossi and Lorenzo are very talented riders,no arguments from me there.But i do think they won their titles because they were on superior bikes.Rossi has proved beyond doubt over the last 2 years, that he needs the best kit to win.Lorenzo would not have won the title this year if he was on a satellite bike,regardless of his awesome talent.Everyone who has won the title for as far back as i care to remember has been on a bike that was the best THAT YEAR,and it was always a factory machine.Regardless of how talented the rider is,that cannot be a coincidence.As Billace has just said,Stoner was the anomaly in the equation.He could win a race on a bike that was clearly inferior to the Yams and Hondas.But he was a one off whos talent was quite exceptional.but i dont think even he would have put a satellite on the top of the podium.The bottom line is,to win the title,you have to be on a factory bike AND have the talent to make the most of it.