You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive. An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary. This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
All the idiots slagging the guy before he's had a chance - are these the same lot bigging up Marquez (with the same lack of info and thought?).
MM had a one-off special chassis and a Repsol budget in M2. Smith had an off-the-pace Mistral.
MM now has THE factory Missile vacated by Stoner.
Smith has a Satellite Tech 3.
So - what do the geniuses slagging off think is a decent result for both eh? IMO....
MM - 4th is LAST as he has THE bike, team & budget. So 3rds and above are needed to prove MM's ability.
Smith - Hasn't the bike for higher than 5th on paper, and has Bradl on a near-works Honda, a fast No1 in Cal, and the factory Dukes to contend with. Yet muppets will slag him for being cr@p if he finishes lower than say 6-7th. CRET!NS!