You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive.
An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the
comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right
of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary.
This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
True - pneumatic valves only yield benefits at high revs yes, but if smaller teams don't have them then it's unfair IMO so make them compulsory. R & D is were the cost is - making the engines is relatively cheap. Kawa & Aprilia are using Pneumatics, so why can't a 1000000 Euro Honda have them?!
I'm of the opinion that if you need TC on the road, then you are not skilled enough to handle such a machine at such speeds on the road. The main reason for TC on 1000cc production bikes is because a lot of 1000cc owners have more money/balls than skill and end up getting hurt. 600cc doesn't need TC - it's just a marketing tool. Full throttle at max lean at max revs on my R6 no problem - it get's loose yes, but there's not enough power to cause a 'real' issue! Look at BSB - they have over 200bhp with no TC and you don't see any more people high-siding than you did 3/5 years ago.
Why do road bikes need seamless boxes when 99.9% of road bikes don't even have quickshifters?! And most quickshifted r