Top five places taken by five different teams. Nice. Hamilton is most likely running pretty light. They've been quick but not that quick.
Posted by Steve - Unregistered (125 days ago)
1 people agree.8 people disagree.
Thought Kubica had done the business then...credit to Hamilton he came out with a blinding lap right at the end....shame he had to go and spoil it with that arrogant celebration as he climbed out of the car....
Reckon Hamilton's the lightest of the big 5, but then again, it looks like fuel load wont be the biggest issue tomorrow.
Whoever can deal with the changing track conditions should do win, and judging by the way the time gaps grew towards the end of the session, I can see Hamilton, Kubica and Rosberg having strong races, while guys like Massa and Kovalainen fade slightly. We shall see!
Posted by Hologide - Unregistered (125 days ago)
7 people agree.1 people disagree.
Arrogant celebration? For getting the chip off his shoulder (his first pole position of the year)...????
Does that make Massa arrogant when he celebrates? Christ how dare they "enjoy the moment"....!!
A cracking drive by Hamilton and Kubica i under the track conditions...
Posted by Mucking Fuddle - Unregistered (125 days ago)
1 people agree.11 people disagree.
Obviously lulu has no more than 5 laps of fuel in that car, as he does not have the talent to get on pole without his team cheating.
Watch as Alonso blasts past him in the pits.
Posted by rich ard - Unregistered (125 days ago)
1 people agree.
Lulu can't get pole with the team cheating - what planet are you rich ard ???. Its a team sport I believe - how is running a car on low fuel cheating ?. I doubt the team would put just 5 laps of fuel in. Anyway the saftey car gets deployed so often at the canada race it may be a good idea !
Posted by sharla - Unregistered (125 days ago)
1 people agree.
thank goodness i am not as bitter as the fake rich ard above. lulu did well and massa et al seemed to bog down a bit. strategies will show who is right. it is possible that lulu and probably alonso are hoping that here wll be several safety car periods. these could work in their favour if they qualified light.
"I am not as bitter as the fake rich ard" rich ard, while I am glad you acknowledge that you have some bitterness, you need to look further inside to see the real situation. Review your posts on Crash - they reveal that you harbour great ill will for Lewis, and express it in a surprising number of ways.
The real joke is I have only used words and sentiments you have expressed on this forum - think on!
As for 'fake' - I won't try to engage you on the subject of identity, either real or virtual, as I know it would be wasted effort.
Posted by rich ard - Unregistered (125 days ago)
2 people agree.
To the last poster,go away you silly little man!!
Posted by Dave - Unregistered (125 days ago)
Dave
I should go away ... why?
Because you say so?
Because you want to continue to rage against the other rich ard?
Posted by rich ard - Unregistered (125 days ago)
1 people agree.
Why rich ard(unregistered)? Because your childish comments are annoying and irritating to those who wish to have rather more sensible arguments here on crash.If I wanted to read comments written by someone with the intellect of a five year old I would visit playground.net!!I just do not understand why anyone with half a brain would act the way you are doing! What exactly do you get out of it??
Posted by Dave - Unregistered (124 days ago)
1 people disagree.
To Dave the irratating little troll who needs to get a life away from suckling on his ma's tits. GO BACK AND HIDE UNDER YOUR STONE BEFORE THE BIRDS PECK YOU.
Posted by rich ard - Unregistered (124 days ago)
What an objectionable little man you are turning out to be rich ard.More disturbing however is your constantly feeling the need to refer to things of a sexual nature!! Perhaps we need to keep an eye out for your impending appearance in the NOTW??? I cannot believe that you Max have the time to be posting here on crash.net????
Posted by Dave - Unregistered (124 days ago)
1 people disagree.
It sounds like that you are the perverted one, want to watch do you?? You nasty dirty little man.
Perhaps you need to get out more and stop wet dreaming over other Crash.net bloggers.
Posted by rich ard - Unregistered (124 days ago)
1 people agree.
It almost seems like you are watching over me to reply within four minutes!!I have all the time in the world and a far bigger vocabulary than you so keep up the pathetic insults.Try to do the next without any sexual references if that is possible,you never know the thought police may be reading your comments???
Posted by Dave - Unregistered (124 days ago)
1 people disagree.
Or is it that YOU are watching over me.
I only have to turn my back and you are in there posting nasty comments. Boosting again about your vocabulary are we? think that you are more intellectual than me do you? I don't think so. I only have to lower myself to get down to your level.
And for your information, that is not a sexual comment.
Posted by rich ard - Unregistered (124 days ago)
Page 1 of 1
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages.
All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message.
We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message.
If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post.
Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.