crash.net home
crash.net home
» Register or Sign-In    Email:   Password:


MENU

F1
Editorial
Columns
Travel
F1 Statistics
Media
Interactive





Add to Google
»

Home

»

F1

»

Topic List

»

Renault 'on target' for fourth in F1 standings.

Sort Comments:

Renault 'on target' for fourth in F1 standings.

Renault chief engineer Alan Permane has admitted that Nelson Piquet's surprise podium in the German Grand Prix has boosted the team's chances of finishing inside the top four of the Formula 1 constructors' championship.

 3 people agree.  4 people disagree.

i hope alosto does not throw his toys out again and helps the team to get the fourth place they deserve.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Barry Wilkinson (133 days ago)
 5 people agree.  5 people disagree.

OMG...Barry, please, just shut up for once... If you are real FORMULA 1 fan, show some respect for double world champion.. FA is an incredibly talanted driver and it's obviuos he works very hard to help his team to reach the best possible position.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by CJ - Unregistered (133 days ago)
 3 people agree.  4 people disagree.

Yeah he works so hard for his team and is so loyal that whenever he moves he is constantly talking to other teams.
Scum!!!
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by lee - Unregistered (133 days ago)
 2 people agree.

I am not Alonso Fan, for that matter any driver on current grid. But its uncalled for to slide every thing on FA. One doesn't become double world champion for nothing and that too in times when there were serious race winners on the grid and not blind crashers and silly mistake makers

As for loyalty to team,Its not a one way street the virtue of Loyalty, F1 is dog eat dog world, the teams leave drivers on sidewalk,without justification. So on that note its not wrong for a driver to be on look out for race winning car.
Accept the fact on the current grid there are only 4 race winning cars two maybe's and rest also rans.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Too Good (133 days ago)
 2 people agree.

If Alonso had never tasted blood he would have been happy to be there. This is tiger who has tasted blood and Tiger who has tasted blood is far more dangerous than a hungry one they say. Any driver in his situation would have done the same.

And If anyone of you who made the nasty FA remarks are ST. LEWIS fans.Its a well documented fact that he and his dad were hobb-nobbing with Williams in 2005, when Ron Dennis had adviced him to stay put in Jr. Formulae. So much for loyalty to hand that feeds you
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Too Good (133 days ago)
 2 people agree.

I am a fan of Alonso, ok now will all the men on this site state where they stand. I am just 3 years into F1 and I love the way Alonso win his 2 wdc in the Michael Schumacher era. Champion comes and champion goes, and you know what, I wish Alonso had won last year with Mclaren, because he does not have a winning car now.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Adolph Robinson (133 days ago)
 3 people disagree.

i see on another site that kimi is re-signing up to end of 2011 with ferrari, so alonso may have to stay with renault, which is no bad thing. but honda are still chasing him hard.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by rich ard (133 days ago)
 1 people agree.  1 people disagree.

I hope he stays and help to build them again. Renault needs to get some more pace in there car.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Adolph Robinson (133 days ago)
Last Edited 133 days ago
Page 1 of 1
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.