Sometimes I think this forum is just one Rossi supporter and one Stoner supporter Arguing with eachother. They both have 50 accounts, so that it looks like more people agree with them. After every practice session they just copy and paste the standard comments and change a few words to make it look original.
As someone else said, Stoner has always been awesome in the wet. He was awesome in the wet long before he got on the Ducati.
Melandri is another great wet weather rider: have you forgotten is fantastic wet-weather powerslide during his win at Phillip Island in 2006? If the Ducati rides itself in the wet, why is Marco only in 10th?
Do you have some inside knowledge, vicripoll? Perhaps, you could let us know your source? When a GP racer gives a reason for his good/bad performance we can never know whether it is a legitimate gripe or a lame excuse. I'm not questioning any specific statement you made, but the three Rossi statements were positive and the statement about Stoner was negative. Perhaps you can give us an objective reason why we should believe the excuses of one rider over another?
QUOTE: "Rossi's maximum-points haul today means he closes the gap to Stoner to 76 points with five races remaining, the next of which comes at Motegi in Japan in a week's time."
There is only four races remaining. So if Stoner finishes ahead of Rossi in the next round (at Motegi), he will win the title.
All the factories have been more restrictive in sending there parts to the satellite teams this year. Just look at how badly the satellite Honda teams are going this year compared to last year.
Those times are looking ominous with Casey Stoner consistently faster than everybody else. We've seen this regularly and it has usually produced the same result: another runaway Stoner victory?
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages.
All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message.
We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message.
If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post.
Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.
