crash.net home
crash.net home
» Register or Sign-In    Email:   Password:



MENU

Interactive





Add to Google
»

Home

»

Topic List

»

Rutter: Byrne, not bike, is dominant factor.

Sort Comments:

Rutter: Byrne, not bike, is dominant factor.

Michael Rutter has reiterated his belief that the controversial weight penalty placed on the Ducatis in recent rounds of the Bennetts British Superbike Championship is not fair.

 6 people agree.  1 people disagree.

Rutter.... someone in the know - with experience!!

I agree totally
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by JVeal - Unregistered (64 days ago)
 4 people agree.  2 people disagree.

Quite agree with Rutter.

Take the top four Ducati riders (Byrne, Camier, Rutter, Laverty) - Total points = 590
Top four Japanese bike riders (Crutchlow, Haslam, Sykes, Ellison)- Total points = 576

The whole weight thing is a nonsense, driven by pressure from HM plant because they expect to win.

Rules should be as simple as possible, 1000cc x 4cyl, 1100cc x 3cyl, 1200cc x 2cyl, minimal modifications, same weight.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Trig - Unregistered (64 days ago)
 4 people agree.  2 people disagree.

as if its in his interests to admit the bike is the difference ... he's on almost the same machinery!

Where was Rutter last year ... struggling to make the top ten?


& Trig ... should those simple rules also allow the Honda's, Yamaha's, Kawa's & Suzuki's to use Titanium & other exotic materials in their engine parts?
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Dice - Unregistered (64 days ago)
 2 people disagree.

Trig - nice convenient use of stats though. Clever to use the top 4 (incl 1 privateer cup rider).

Why dont you just keep it simple & look at the top Ducati vs the top 1000cc 4? If you could add the top 2 jap manufacturers point the chapionship would be closer than it is now!
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Dice - Unregistered (64 days ago)
 3 people agree.  1 people disagree.

yeah I agree with Dice, Rutter hasn't won in over three years and now this year on the 1098 look at him go ! Now I'm not knocking Rutter as I think he's a great rider but it really does look like Ducati have a considerable advantage this year and the weight penalty is not an over reaction at all.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Dan - Unregistered (64 days ago)
 2 people agree.  1 people disagree.

Woah Dan you can't have it both ways :-)

(i) Agreed Rutter is an excellent rider - But since he left HM Plant which prioritised Kiyo (and Rutter spend a fair amount of time helping Kiyo too) he hasn't been on the most competitive machinery, plus he's carried more than his share of injuries.

(ii) IF it was the Bike he'd have been on the podium since the start of the season.

I'm not so sure his bike is quite on a par with Airwaves'.
A big part of the reason he did well last week was a bold, canny tyre choice.

That said, bit or a non-sequiteur for 'im to argue the rules worked well for ages so they shouldn't have been changed .... If they hadn't been changed then no 1098s.
.. I wonder?
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Hedgeholer (64 days ago)
 1 people agree.

I think Rutter is hard core,simple as that.Isle of man and NW200,takes balls of steel,i have the utter most respect for that man
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by pagoda - Unregistered (63 days ago)
 1 people disagree.

If its not the Bike what is it Byrne couldnt do anything in 2 years on the 4 cylinders apart from demand huge wages
Because of the weak BSB rules and structure which was built around over the counter bikes which Airwaves or Northwest 200 have not got then they are not playing to the rules or spirit of the sport Which is why some teams will walk away in 2009
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Manager - Unregistered (63 days ago)
 1 people agree.  1 people disagree.

Manager - what makes you think Byrne didn't do anything in 2 years on 4 cylinders? He did extremely well considering the bikes he was riding.

Another reason Byrne is doing so well this year is that the top talent left i.e. Kiyonari, Lavilla and Rea.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Sick Cylinder - Unregistered (63 days ago)
 1 people agree.

The teams walking away from BSB in 2009 will probably be Airwaves / GSE Ducati who have been wanting to get back into World Supers for a long time - it will depend on the sponsor and what equipment guarantees they get from Ducati. HM Plant Honda are also looking to leave - their operation in BSB was a test bed for the Suzuka 8 hours - now that they can't run prototype Michelins or highly tuned engines it makes more sense to switch to World Supers.

Losing the GSE and HM Plant duopoly may not be a bad thing - you'll see Suzuki and Yamaha winning again and Kawasaki won't be so far back.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Anorak - Unregistered (63 days ago)
 1 people agree.  2 people disagree.

Manager - The reasons Byrne didn't win in 2007 have been thoroughly discussed in numerous different threads. I'm not running through it all again in detail. Suffice to say that Byrne finished 5th last year as the highest placed non-factory Honda, bagging a race win, 9 podiums and 18 top-6 finishes out of 26 races. And all on a non-competitive Honda on crap tyres (as opposed to HMPlants super grippy Michelins and factory support), and run by a small / semi-private team (Paul Bird) with limited experience of racing Hondas. Compare that to what Ellison is doing in 2008 in Bike-Animal's 2nd BSB year. Quite an achievement on Byrne's part.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Nitro Nori (63 days ago)
Last Edited 63 days ago
Losing GSE and HM Plant a good thing???? Are you for real????
BSB will become nothing more than a backwoods event, no TV coverage anywhere, minimal crowds. Pointless.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Moot - Unregistered (63 days ago)
 1 people disagree.

Trig you talk of keeping the rules simple, well the simplest solution is to have the bikes all competing with the same cc, weight and tuning modifications. If the V twin engine is so good as a racing engine then it shouldn't need cc and/or tuning advantages.

If twin cyclinder engines keep getting these concesssions then the racing will never be as fair as it should be and arguments about whether a rider using a twin cyclinder superbike is any good or not will continue for a long time to come. This is where MotoGP has it right as far as bike specifications go - all using the same cc and tuning but we still have the different engine configurations.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by 190mph - Unregistered (63 days ago)
 1 people disagree.

Slick Cylinder
The only reason Byrne won the champoionship in 2003 was because Reynolds was injured at the Silverstone round and carried his injury till midseason, who then became top points scorer in the second half of the season and as for Nitro Nori saying he had a **** bike and tyres in 2007 he had the pick of the chosen few NTR range that Dunlop gave to there chosen riders which not everyone where able to get and by the way Camier was doing alright on his private Honda untill his accident wasn't he and they had the same support
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Manager - Unregistered (63 days ago)
 1 people agree.

Reynolds outscored Byrne by an awesome 10 points in the second half of the 2003 season, and was beaten by Byrne by a lucky 130 points. It's called "how to win a championship", Reynolds would know and respect that.

What do they say in racing? To finish first, first you have to finish.

Byrne has a proven record on Ducati, Suzuki and Honda, not many can say that.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Frog - Unregistered (62 days ago)
"The championship has been run so well for many years they should have just left it alone"
Does that include allowing 1200cc bikes in as well?

Mind you, I do agree that riders & bikes weight should be combined as they are in F1.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Dave - Unregistered (61 days ago)
Yeah, let's go back to the rules that guaranteed good racing. That means 4 cylinder 750s and 1000cc for the twins.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Frog - Unregistered (61 days ago)
if rutters sayin that he nos **** all wer was he last year now look at him on the ducati up with the front boys and the same for bryne no wer last year and winning this year
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by dani dulson - Unregistered (58 days ago)
Page 1 of 1
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.