crash.net home
crash.net home
» Register or Sign-In    Email:   Password:



MENU

MOTOGP
Editorial
Columns
Media
Interactive





Add to Google
»

Home

»

MotoGP

»

Topic List

»

Bridgestone single-tyre bid confirmed.

Sort Comments:

Bridgestone single-tyre bid confirmed.

On the same day that Michelin announced it would not bid to become the single MotoGP tyre supplier in 2009, the FIM has confirmed that rival Bridgestone has submitted a proposal.

 10 people agree.  4 people disagree.

It is shamefull, that Michelin has been pressed out of MotoGp by the Japs in this way. Safety and cost are ridicolously pretended reasons. It means no competition in the tyre development and exclusive money for the Dorna.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by asmaco - Unregistered (50 days ago)
 4 people agree.  7 people disagree.

Whilst in many ways sad that MotoGP will have a single tyre rule, I'm glad that it has gone to Bridgestone. After all, they have spent years catching up with Michelin, often working against very biased rules, and finally prevailed.
I don't accept the argument that the single tyre will stop development. After all, Pirelli started from a very low base, but their tyres in WSB & BSB are now way better than when they started up.
And surely nobody can argue that racing in both WSB & BSB has been much closer and fairer as a result of single tyres.
Bridgestone has MotoGP, Dunlop 125, 250 & AMA, and Pirelli WSB & BSB. Reputationally and image wise, the real losers will be Michelin.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Zoom - Unregistered (50 days ago)
 1 people agree.  1 people disagree.

Does anyone know what the rules around the rule will be?

Will Bridgestone be allowed to make tyres specificly for each rider or will it be more like WSBK where they take a bunch of tyres & riders go pick which ones they want?
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Ronald Revsak (50 days ago)
 3 people agree.  7 people disagree.

Very good news for the racing fans and for the show.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by maxence - Unregistered (50 days ago)
 3 people agree.  4 people disagree.

Speaking without the benefit of a background in tyres, it seems to me that all that has happened is we now have a level playing field regarding tyres. - Riders/Teams will no longer be able to blame an inferior tyre for their lack of success in a race - a minor migraine or disagreement with the missus should do as an acceptable excuse (dont get out of your prams folks, that is an attempt at humour).

I've clearly missed something here, so can someone please explain how it is that (according to "asmaco"), Michelin have so shamefully been pressed out of MotoGp? - My understanding is that they simply did not bid to be the supplier. - I see no fiendish eastern plot here!
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by jofiach - Unregistered (49 days ago)
 1 people agree.  1 people disagree.

WOW i never saw THAT comming !
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by tom - Unregistered (49 days ago)
 1 people agree.  1 people disagree.

'Spec tires belong in support series'?
Wot, like Formula 1 or WSB???
A totally stupid comment SP3.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Otto - Unregistered (49 days ago)
 6 people agree.  1 people disagree.

What next, a single control bike! so much for being a prototype championship with emphasis on engineering excellence. Dorna should have let it be and let the teams choose which supplier they wanted and it would have been amazing to see Ducatis, Kawasaki's and Suzukis switching to Michelen if rumours are to be believed. Now we have Bridgestone with no competition for 3 years whereas we could have had a fired up Michelen trying to restore some corporate pride for 2009 season. Dorna mark this up in another of your screw ups.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by po - Unregistered (49 days ago)
 3 people agree.  2 people disagree.

What a complete disaster for motoGP, the pinnacle of bike racing, hamstrung by a stupid single make tyre rule.

Just what do Dorna/FIM think they are doing, or do they even know what they are doing?

F1 is the biggest pile of processional crap there is, and MotoGP will be right up there along side F1 within a a couple of years.

I don't blame Michelin for not bidding and getting involved with the Spanish mafia's control of MotoGP.

and why do we have to have umpteen different representations in racing, reading the list of attendees at this meeting is like what British Leyland was like with it's unions in the 70's.

Read my lips MotoGP will be on it's bottom in no time...a bad day!
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Ray Von (49 days ago)
 4 people agree.  1 people disagree.

I think bridgestone is a good one to go with... every team/manufacturer has at least one rider on bridgestones so there wont be huge amounts of set up data lost. it was either the most equal tyre to be chosen or a brand new one i.e pirelli... obviously michelin are a french company, gave up pretty easily hehehe
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Paul 46!!! (49 days ago)
 1 people agree.  1 people disagree.

There is no place to emotional comments!... Favourite riders already made their choices like Rossi, Stoner and Pedrosa so next year probably Michelin would be refused by its weak performance if they continue to stay?

Now the final score is:
Bridgestone: 2
Michelin: 0



What about WRC???
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by BULENT - Unregistered (49 days ago)
 4 people agree.  1 people disagree.

Here's a compromise. Make them run Bridgestone fronts and Michelin rears.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Marcster chief - Unregistered (49 days ago)
 1 people agree.  1 people disagree.

I don't think F1 run a spec tyre Otto, bridgestone is just the only manufacturer supplying tyres. I beleive another supplier would be free to join F1.

This is bit sad though. MotoGP needs to watch itself. The move to 800cc killed the racing a bit, now they are going with a spec tyre and the grid is also pretty small at the moment, 18 (i think) bikes is a little on the low side.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by FooAtari . (49 days ago)
 1 people agree.  1 people disagree.

Actully, F1 is mono-tyre and BS have the contract. F1 went to mono-tyre in 2007 after Michelin won the world championship back to back in 2005 and 2006. Michelin's answer was the same then as it is today in not taking part in mono-tyre world championships.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by bib_tyre - Unregistered (49 days ago)
 2 people agree.  1 people disagree.

I have no problem with this - Michelin looked to be on the way out - I am sure that the Yamaha and Honda factory teams would have seriously considered going to Bridgestone next year - I mean why a) split a garage down the middle running 2 different tyres and b)Bridgestone have the upper hand

Plus Motogp is not really going anywhere - where are the new teams - the impetus is with WSB - Motogp grids are short on bikes - probably why they have 3 on a grid row to spread the numbers out
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Andrew Long (49 days ago)
 2 people agree.  1 people disagree.

Jerry Burgess pulls no punches as regards this matter in octobers 'bike' magazine interview. Carmelo Ezpeleta has no clue about the dynamics of motogp bikes, of that there is no doubt. He should go sell a car or bike event that is at the base of the ladder and not strangle what was,pretty much, the last of a none controlled world series. Everyone involved in motogp, bar this controller and his yes men, told him that a 250gp bike went round corners faster than a 800cc gp bike.Dunlop being sole supplier to 250's would indicate that a sole motogp supplier isn't going to slow an 800 down..next step a standard issue 'fim ecu' or maybe a rev limiter and a fixed cylinder number format Mr Ezpeleta ?
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Dean Dean (49 days ago)
 1 people agree.  1 people disagree.

Quote: 'Spec tires belong in support series'?
Wot, like Formula 1 or WSB???
A totally stupid comment SP3.
Posted by Otto - Unregistered (13 hours ago)

Yes Otto just like in those formulae. Spec tires are stupid in those series as well.

Michelin would probably not be in the series as things stood anyway. If they pulled out for a year or two leaving only Bridgestone that would be OK with me. MANDATING that there only be one supplier in F1 or MotoGP (even SBK) is dumb. Next year will have the same few guys at the sharp end - a spec tire will do nothing to "fix" that "problem".
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by SP3 - Unregistered (49 days ago)
 1 people agree.  1 people disagree.

There was a time when the bike manufacturers and tyre manufacturers worked together to optimise a chassis to work with a particular tyre, now call me stupid, but i don't see how one tyre will fit all motorcycles.

Even on road bikes, certain tyres work better on one bike than they do on another.

Perhaps due to the tyre rules all chassis development will follow a same path, so in effect we will end up with a one make class, but with different names on the sides of the bikes.

Let's not forget this is supposed to be competition, i don't see that going on with the tyres anymore.
Report Abuse Agree with this comment Disagree with this comment
Posted by Ray Von (48 days ago)
Page 1 of 1
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.