F1 » PIC FROM PAST: Controversy hits Singapore

Remember when... #ThrowbackThursday

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest


September 19, 2013 10:51 AM

Nelson was a spineless tit. The fact that he only revealed the truth when it benefited his own self-interest shows how poor his moral judgement is. Selfish, just like his father. I can't believe the FIA made concessions for him when he was just as guilty as all other parties involved.


September 19, 2013 1:44 PM

What I don't understand about this, is that it was a very good tactical move. Was it morally wrong? Yes. But I don't see how it's any different to other team orders of asking one driver to move out of the way.


September 19, 2013 2:00 PM

Webberton, it affected the WHOLE field, not one driver. Not everybody would be able to have a harmless crash if instructed to do so. The penalties were not enough. They even tried this in NASCAR a fortnight ago and got nabbed.

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.