Crash.Net User: GreenEnvy 22

Comments rating: 454
Position in rating: 433

Show Comments on:

GreenEnvy 22

June 08, 2010 4:42 PM

MotoGP » COMMENT: Who should replace Rossi at Yamaha?

I'd think Spies will do two more races on Tech3 (might be Rossi's bike, but in Tech3 colours). Then switch to Fiat since he will be at 9 races (unless the rules states 9 races at beginning of season), until Rossi returns. Crutchlow I think *could* ride for Tech3 straight away, because he is not a fulltime MotoGP rider, he would be classified a wildcard. I don't think they will give him that seat though, unless maybe for the two races Spies is still in Tech3.

GreenEnvy 22

March 22, 2010 12:53 PM

MotoGP » Melandri 'bitter, 'worried' Gresini calls for Honda help

DDD, I agree that much of Honda's problems are a lack of a good development rider, or not listening to anyone but Pedrosa. Nicky seems to be a good development rider,he developed the 2006 bike that tested a lot of ideas for the 2007 800cc, and the Ducati has become much more ridable since he joined. I also agree with Chris, the quicker Honda's are the two guys (and their mechanics) who are used to Ohlins. The others should catch up soon, but the limited testing sure hurts.

GreenEnvy 22

March 18, 2010 4:53 PM

WSBK » Kyalami to leave WSBK calendar

Mikel, I'd love to see a race in Canada, but we have no suitable track. Mosport is a great track, but needs a lot of money to do safety upgrades, facility upgrades, and the like. Mont Tremblant I don't think would quite cut it, it's a bit small. Other then that, I don't think we have any road courses anywhere near good enough for WSBK. There are a couple projects in the works, but I believe they are all a couple years away.

Page 6 of 14
« 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.