Crash.Net User: Snakecharmer

Comments rating: 898
Position in rating: 170

Show Comments on:

Snakecharmer

May 14, 2015 6:28 PM

F1 » Danica Patrick not ruled out of Haas F1 plans


kosh naranek: “Danica Patrick is highly marketable and if anything we're very lucky that GoDaddy is giving us enough time to find a sponsor that she'll fit with, because she can sell anything. She has as much attention at the race track as any of the drivers so she's a very valuable person." Says it all right there.....it's all about the money! I would rather see Susie Wolf, Carmen Jorda, or even Simona de Silvestro (even though she's not very good), Shannon McIntosh, Cyndie Alleman...just don't like all the hype around Danica Patrick although she is probably one of the best current female drivers statistics wise.
irrespective of what the poison dwarf says I don't think any of the women on the circuit are good enough TBH, I don't mean that in a sexist way ... just not good enough for F1

Snakecharmer

May 14, 2015 6:25 PM

F1 » Danica Patrick not ruled out of Haas F1 plans


here4thesun2:
Cris Zarate: The most over-rated driver regardless of sex... there are more qualified drivers out there, like likes of Kobayashi, Sutil or Van der guard... Even Susie Wolff would be a better choice, but since it's an American team, maybe their priority is an American driver.
If they want an American F1 driver, there is only one choice - Juan Pablo Montoya. JPM is as American as Frankfurters and Apple Tarts. :)
waaayyyyy tooo fat .... and nowhere near as fit to look at

Snakecharmer

April 15, 2015 6:22 PM

F1 » Mercedes refuses to introduce team orders


richard: its an odd comment given their history. if there were no team orders, then why did they tell lulu to pll his finger out, other than to maintain the status quo of lulu first and nico second?
I don't suppose it was because LH was controlling his own race but when Merc realised that Vettel could get to Nico they advised LH to get his lap times down ?!!! seems to me it was a status quo, Nico couldn't get close without wrecking his tyres and Vettel said the same thing .... or am I being to logical ?

Snakecharmer

April 13, 2015 6:29 PM

F1 » Rosberg explains Hamilton criticism


here4thesun2: Some advice, in order to enter a gentlemen's agreement, you need two gentlemen. You have enough proof to prove that Hamilton is not a team player and will only help himself. Case closed, get on with it. \blockquote] I don't recall a TEAM PLAYER ever winning a championship, the champions are ALL selfish ba5tards only out for themselves, as regards LH backing Nico into Vettel, LH was controlling his own race and if I remember it was Jack Brabham or certainly Prost said the idea is to win the race at the slowest possible speed, I thought that's what LH was doing although I'm sure some will have a different view.

Snakecharmer

April 13, 2015 6:37 PM

F1 » Rosberg explains Hamilton criticism


richard: vettel also said that when he was closing on nico (proving that he was faster at that stage), the aero affected him and his tyres, and that mounting an attack was not possible. no harm no foul in my book then, Nico couldn't get to LH and Vettel couldn't get to Nico although I wish the safety car hadn't come out I would love to have heard what Vettel would say when Kimi got to him haha

Snakecharmer

April 12, 2015 8:12 PM
Last Edited 42 days ago

F1 » Rosberg blasts Hamilton for ‘compromising race’


Phranc: . I would say that all the great champions of the past had to really work for their titles and did not have a money is no object career, literally thrown at them. If he is as good as he claims he is he would already be a multiple champion when in fact he only won the one he has by a fluke. Was there just a little skulduggery involve in that win maybe, just maybe.?????????????????????
Hmmmm...... Schumacher, Ferrari, 2000-2004....... great champions of the past had to really work for their titles and did not have a money is no object career ......are you sure ?!!!


Page 1 of 58
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.