F1 » Hamilton refuses to blame reliability

Interesting that KR with KERS couldn't keep up with LH without KERS, but with the weight of KERS, in the final dash to the flag. Is this the comparative performance of Ferrari vs Mclaren at the moment?

MOTOGP » Rossi: We need more traction.

Sandbagging

F1 » Massa blanks Piquet amid Singapore fall-out.

You know, you're right guys. There have been so many tainted championships in recent years, I wonder why we continue to watch it. Is it because the injustices only serve to confirm our opinions? I don't know. All I can say is that even with all the FIA help that Ferrari received last year, they didn't win the WDC, but then again, their first priority is the constructors title anyway, and they got that. With regards to Singapore 2008, if the results are t be changed, who can say how they will be changed? Do they disqualify Renault and their drivers and promote everyone up one place or annul the race. Each would give a different result, in isolation.

MOTOGP » Lorenzo leads Pedrosa in Estoril practice.

I could hear them from my office, if my windows weren't shut.

MOTOGP » 'Rusty' Rossi wants braking balance.

Sandbagging

F1 » Alonso could quit with third title

But... will he get it? Or, will he throw his toys out of the pram when he realises that Massa is just as good as him and won't give him an inch, just like LH did. He may be a good racer, hell, they all are, but I tire of this guy.

F1 » Rossi: Former F1 champ Raikkonen 'is not very fast'

I thought he had mellowed, but comments like this show that he's still got his head up his own a r s e.

F1 » Rossi: Former F1 champ Raikkonen 'is not very fast'

Jon, what you are saying is that VR came either 1st, 2nd of 3rd in EVERY race? Get real.

F1 » Rossi: Former F1 champ Raikkonen 'is not very fast'

Why did he feel he had to comment?

F1 » Mosley: Vatanen 'will lose badly' for his insults

The FIA. The head must be chopped off and a new one put in it's place. It is striking that even on his way out, he can't help himself. He has to meddle. He has to be so biased that he would try to discredit AV so that his man can get in. He doesn't even care who knows it, by releasing the letter. A vote for JT will be a vote for MM. Do the people who vote really know what's going on in the organisation that represents them?