News
Pics
Web
SEARCH
REGISTER
|
LOG-IN
HOME
F1
MOTOGP
CARS
BIKES
PICTURES
GRID GIRLS
VIDEO
CLASSIFIEDS
|
TRAVEL & TICKETS
|
AUDIO
|
PODCASTS
|
QUIZZES
|
POLLS
|
HAVE YOUR SAY
|
EDIT HOMEPAGE
|
Here:
»
Home
»
Have Your Say
»
TriumphST
RECOMMENDED COMMENT
13 agree.
6 disagree.
Should Alonso get to Ferrari in 2009 expect red to be the colour of the WDC for another 4-years
Posted by
TriumphST
(511 days ago)
Show Comments on:
News
Pictures
F1
»
Hamilton 'will lose horribly' in media battle.
Ellen Bach I see you reconsidered your "I will go and do something more valuable with my time!" couldn't find anything better to do then come up with that, nice one!
Posted by
TriumphST
(511 days ago)
F1
»
Hamilton 'will lose horribly' in media battle.
1 agrees.
2 disagree.
Lewis just been unveiled as the face of Reebok at £2m for 10 days a year and quotes Denzel Washington, Will Smith, and Naomi Campbell as “They are people I look up to,” he said. “And I am able to turn to them and get some advice from them because they are in the same sort of situation as me.”. Well Smith comes over as a great guy, Washington's a great actor and probably a role model as well but Naomi? Perhaps he ought to look elsewhere to get in touch with his feminine side. I suspect that before long you'll see Lewis becoming involved with scientology. I totally agreed with JR, (unsurprising as that was my post) and also the point by chu chu regarding Ron Dennis.
Posted by
TriumphST
(511 days ago)
F1
»
Lauda questions McLaren penalties.
[Post Removed]
Posted by
TriumphST
(515 days ago)
Last Edited 515 days ago
F1
»
Hamilton sends out Silverstone warning.
3 agree.
3 disagree.
Testing is no barometer of race pace, teams either follow their own program, sandbag or set out to make a statement (usually undeserved, to grab a headline). Wasn't last years pole a low fuel gesture to the home fans? a little like FA's Monaco/Magny attempts. All part of the PR! While no Ferrari fan, they'll probably stroll it.
Posted by
TriumphST
(516 days ago)
F1
»
Lauda questions McLaren penalties.
2 disagree.
NoMax Apart from mixing SI with Imperial the math's is wrong the energy embodied with that mass and velocity (which is de-accelerating) from the moment of detachment is less the 600J (1kWh=3600000J), half of your figure. Furthermore something of little mass but reasonable surface area would rapidly dissipate that energy in air (density 1.2kG/cuMtr) remaining either on the track or usually track-side. Bit's fall off cars all the time and with the exception of those from major incidents pose little risk to spectator's official's or following drivers. The risk was minimal as the outcome showed. NoMax: My apologies your quite right on the energy at 1.2kJ enough to heat a cup water 1.5 deg
Posted by
TriumphST
(516 days ago)
Last Edited 516 days ago
F1
»
Lauda questions McLaren penalties.
9 disagree.
Strangely I didn't thing LH was unfairly penalised, certainly Kovie and Rosberg accepted theirs as deserved. McLaren whatever they felt wisely accepted and got on with the job. Quite rightly, James Andrews in the first post makes the point for professional stewards, conspiracies no, simply because KR didn't get penalised was probably the right judgement call, it wasn't as if the rear wing was going to fly off and the car take to the air. KR's exhaust wasn't a danger to anyone, had been looked at when he pitted and a judgement made and as the events proved the right one. To do anything else would have been grossly unfair and unsporting. Last point don''t mix SI and Imperial units!
Posted by
TriumphST
(517 days ago)
F1
»
Hamilton: I'm not distracted by F1 glamour.
3 agree.
7 disagree.
Norma:James:White, Let's deal with the thread first, LH fully deserved the penalty (in both Montreal and Magny), no question of FIA conspiracy, Ferrari bias or anything else some fevered minds dream up, LH driving the car on both occasions and was solely responsible. LH can't open his mouth mouth without putting his foot in it and the only question that occurs to him is "which one do I stuff in first today?". While an unfortunate character trait is undeniably the case. On the PR front, Bishop has had a significant influence on the Hamilton rhetoric and should take credit for that. Any latent negativity in the media or unpopularity with fan's is down to who? Couldn't be Hamilton, No?
Posted by
TriumphST
(519 days ago)
F1
»
Hamilton needs to refocus, insists Blundell.
2 agree.
1 disagrees.
You''re scrubbed off the X-mas card list then.
Posted by
TriumphST
(519 days ago)
F1
»
Hamilton: I'm not distracted by F1 glamour.
1 agrees.
4 disagree.
Let's face it, we were writing about this since Hamilton's debut in F1 when it was obvious he was going to be a PR disaster (painfully apparent from Monaco last year). As a consequence Matt Bishop from Autosport was appointed McLaren's PR guru towards the end of last season to specifically manage the problem. To be fair he's had some success unfortunately he can't be on hand all the time and on those occasions 'loose cannon' Hamilton reverts to type (resulting in Bishop inspired retractions/press releases). Hamilton's responses and interviews are so full of hype, mendacity and spin and knowing what to expect (and never been disappointed) I personally avoid them at all costs!
Posted by
TriumphST
(519 days ago)
Last Edited 519 days ago
F1
»
Hamilton
will
make mistakes, warns Stewart.
2 agree.
7 disagree.
So Jackie for one who spoke with sense and eloquence on the MosleySexScandle you can talk out of your Tam''O''Shanter. Inexperience? this is a guy who''s been racing and mollycoddled under the tutelage of McLaren since god knows when and now your saying he needs to be told what a red light means? Your right Einstein he''s not but he is 21/22 and been out of nappies for quite some time now, surly it''s time he learnt to do things for himself and to accept responsibility for his mistakes just like the rest of us. But mostly Jackie be consistent, don''t tell us one day he''s the greatest ever then he''s bound to make mistakes because of inexperience!
Posted by
TriumphST
(533 days ago)
Page 4 of 10
«
‹
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
›
»
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.
^ Skip to Top
Site Map
MOTORSPORT
F1
NASCAR
WRC
WTCC
Indycar
GP2
Renault WS
Sportscars
F3
DTM
BTCC
V8 Supercars
A1GP
Rally UK
MotoGP
WSBK
BSB
Moto-X
INTERACTIVE
Audio
Podcasts
Have Your Say
Polls
RSS Newsfeeds
Make Homepage
Contact Us
Jobs
Free Screensavers
Official Links
Unofficial Links
Race Cars for Sale
SERVICES
Motorcycle Insurance
Bike Insurance
Motoring Experiences
Motorcycling Experiences
Loans
© 1999 - 2009 Crash Media Group
The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.
Contact Crash.Net
|
Advertise on Crash.Net
|
Our Privacy Policy
|
About Crash.Net
|
Get News Feeds
|
Need a Website?
Find
car reviews
on sports
cars
such as
Ferrari
,
BMW
,
Porsche
and many more.