Crash.Net User: Mark _

Comments rating: 3704
Position in rating: 22

Show Comments on:

Mark _

August 26, 2014 7:02 PM

F1 » Button: The best man isn’t winning


Snakecharmer: So let me get this straight please..... are all the anti Hamilton bashers saying it was his fault that the car behind drove into him because he took the racing line and Nico didn't make an error of judgement ?!!!
Nope. People are saying that they drove into each other and it is just a racing incident. Both could have avoided it but neither of them backed down. Simple really.

Mark _

August 26, 2014 7:43 PM

F1 » Button: The best man isn’t winning


Elswagger: Both drivers could have avoided an incident but the F1 rules make it Rosberg’s responsibility.
Perhaps you can quote the specific rule to support your statement. As I understand the rule the defending driver needs to leave a car's width if any part of a competitor's car is alongside. What the stewards should be investigating is Lewis intentionally parking a competitive car to gain an advantage.

Mark _

August 26, 2014 4:41 PM
Last Edited 58 days ago

F1 » Button: The best man isn’t winning


ProfessorX - Lewis got the 10th fastest lap of the race. It may have not been the fastest but it was still competitive. A safety car could have helped him, like it did in Hungary. Lewis once again tries to get an unfair advantage by quitting. What the stewards should be investigating is the unwarranted parking of his car to get said advantage. An argument could also be made that Lewis steered into Nico by cutting to the inside curb with a car next to his rear wheel. I am not surprised that Button talks up Lewis as it just makes him look better for taking the fight to Lewis when they were teammates.

Mark _

August 26, 2014 5:21 PM

F1 » Button: The best man isn’t winning


ProfessorX:
Mark : ProfessorX - Lewis got the 10th fastest lap of the race. It may have not been the fastest but it was still competitive. .... .
Reason Mark, it's called reason. That fast lap was probably set on a set of tires that did not last worth a ****. Also your argument is wrong, Lewis was on the racing line, Nico deliberately cut right, right in to Lewis Hamilton's rear wheel, there is no question, Nico deliberately cut hard right, right in to the rear wheel of Lewis Hamilton. I can't repeat it enough, because it's right in front of your eyes, either Nico was off the course for blundering it in a chicane, or Nico had to crash in to Lewis to stay on the track, the only part of Nico's car beside Lewis's was his nose. Nico 100% completely at fault for choosing to steer in to his teammate.
So was Schumacher innocent in Adelaide when he took the racing line with Hill there?

Mark _

August 26, 2014 7:07 PM

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims


ProfessorDave: Several times earlier in the season the two Merc drivers have been side-by-side in a corner and Hamilton has driven Rosberg off the track. So Nico wanted to make a point at Spa. His point was "next time we're side-by-side in a corner I'm going to hold my ground and if you want that to result in contact that's your choice". Good point, well made!
This sums it up perfectly. Now the question is, did Lewis learn anything from this?

Mark _

August 26, 2014 5:14 PM

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims


For those who think that Lewis was correct to take the racing line how do you compare this incident to the famous Schumacher/Hill collision in Adelaide? The difference is that there was no rule about keeping a cars width in those days but many of you don't believe in that rule anyway. So was Schumacher innocent?


Page 10 of 485
« 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.