Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -3639
Position in rating: 6683

Show Comments on:


August 27, 2014 9:44 PM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’

clichy. do you really follow f1! if you did, ou would know why there is so much said about lulu. he may be a reasonably good driver, but to try and equate him to the others you mention is just plain daft. mansell great? no, he "lucked" into an exceptional car. clark just lucky? HAHAHAHA. stirling bitter about mike? HAHAHAHA. and how on earth can the wrong driver be leading the wdc? last time i checked, the driver with the most points was leading, and he is the right driver to be leading.


August 27, 2014 7:08 PM

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims

35edme: Petronas, the folk sponsoring the team issued a statement. Can someone at Crash post that statement . They are unhappy with someone and we'd all like to know with whom .
my reading of it is that they are unhappy with merc allowing this situation to develope into a media spat! they are not attributing any blame to either of the drivers. they are right. it is the MEDIA who are blowing it up, and unfortunately it is the partisan british media and some hanger ons.


August 27, 2014 10:47 AM

F1 » Button: The best man isn’t winning

sunny. the nutty professor now claims to know more about the rules than the rule makers themselves. he even makes out that fia dont know how to interpret them either (i may be with him on that!) its odd how NOBODY in authority has even hinted that nico broke the rules. i watched the re run last night, and it is as plain as the nose on your face, that nico was well alongside lulu as he entered the corner, and that lulu cut across the nose of lulus car a it fell back slightly so as to avoid being pushed off the road. as i said fia / stewards have stated that nico did NO wrong, but that is not enough for the fanboys. i still call it a racing incident, as happened with vettel alonso, grosjean bianchi etc, and as happens in every race on the calendar.


August 27, 2014 2:20 PM
Last Edited 7 hours ago

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims

JedPB67: I didn't see Hamilton push Rosberg off track, neither did Lauda, Wolff or Coulthard. In fact, seemingly, the only people that did watch Hamilton push Rosberg off track were Hamilton haters. Deal with it.
Jed. well, if you leave no room for a car to stay on track, then you are pushing (or trying to push) the other car off the track so as to handicap it and prevent the pass. nico stood his ground, as he was entitled to . end of! glad to see that you race, but alas scalextrix does not count. please also list all the people in the paddock who are saying that nico was wrong. you dont know my connections, but i can assure you that certainly is not the case. nearly all are saying that it was just a racing incident. get over it. if it had been the other way around, you would be on here crowing that nico got his comuppance. you fanboys are really really sad, and not lovers of f1!


August 27, 2014 10:40 AM

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims

tai. welcome back. as you can see, rgt is still in full flow with is mltiname posting etc. elswagger/rgt. yes, i said that lulu could cause a serious accident, and the fact that rules have been changed due to some of his dismeanours, shows that i was right. and also, if you read the comments, you will see that even brundle and coulthard had stated that lulu had lost grip as he entered the bend, this possibly caused him to run wide, and if nico had not actually backed off, whilst still holding his line, then there would have been quite a horrendous crash! kiwibob. you need to grow up. lauda made his comment without having the full facts. and of course he has to defend lulu. his position relies on lulu delivering!

Page 1 of 1868
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.