Recommended Comment

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

120 agree. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
anybody who stoops to such childish abuse, is NOT a fan of f1!
Posted by richard (545 days ago)
Recommended Comment
Show Comments on:

Have Your Say Comments
Report Abuse
ghog. funny that it has not appeared on crah as yet. maybe not enough confirmation? was at wtcc in salzburgring yesterday, great weather and racing, and on my way to monaco as a guest. so missing a lot of the news.
Posted by richard (2 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
ghog, you sure are slow! i mentioned this two days ago! stirrer. ok, you dont like schumi, but what you are saying abi=out him is not nice. you claimhe is morally bankrupt? who says? presumably that is YOUR opinion. i challenged you yesterday to list the times when schumi CHEATED, but you havent.
Posted by richard (3 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
and not a red bull can in sight! even though it looks as if it gave seb ..wings. rob. a bit better than the vodafone adds!
Posted by richard (4 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
3 agree. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
stirrer. you did not answer my previous question. however, you say that schumi will be called to account. so i would ask you to list instances where SCHUMI was cheating.
Posted by richard (4 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
4 agree. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
rob. i fully agree. if we did not have rule bending, then we would not have such advanced machinery in f1, or in any other sport. rules are made to be bent, not broken. we may not like it at times, but we dont go round calling anyone who bends the rules, a cheat. cheating is punishable, rule bending isnt. that is the difference. stirrer. name me your favourite driver and his team,and i would bet that i could find many instances where they have bent rules, but have not cheated. so calling someone a cheat, is highly insulting when you do not have any proof.
Posted by richard (4 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
3 agree. 3 disagree.
Report Abuse
the stirrer. alas there is no hope for you. notice how merc have been involved in rule bending, by introducing a ddrs. even mclaren with their original f-duct was rule bending. and then there was the dd of brawn. all these were deemed lEGAL, even if not within the spirit of the existing rules. now, like honda, if a second fuel collection tank is fitted to deceive the scrutineers, then that is CHEATING, and was punished accordingly. may i suggest that you look up the terms in a dictionary, before you use them in future.
Posted by richard (4 days ago)
Last Edited 4 days ago
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
ty. no wonder you are adder brained! i didnt say that maldonado won due to luck, but just that he was able to manage all aspects of the car, better. sunny, ferrari after race report stated that alonsos tyres went off, due to "loss of downforce from the front, due to losing aero up close to pm" this caused more tyre wear so they went off. there was no change in aero on the car, so it would be impossible to find a sudden aero problem
Posted by richard (4 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
5 agree. 4 disagree.
Report Abuse
the stirrer. you obviously cannot distinguish the ndifference between "rule bending" and "cheating" . one is legal, the other not, unless you know different.
Posted by richard (4 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
5 agree. 4 disagree.
Report Abuse
ty. of course they will come up. but are these CHEATING? i wouldnt class them as that. unethical for 1 and 3, yes. cheating includes such things as stealing others data and using it yourself. putting in a secret fuel tank to mislead scrutineers, putting in an extra fiddle pedal to break the no traction control rule etc etc. i am glad that you agree that the dhill crash has been admitted by hill, as his own fault. there are many who still go on about it being schumis.
Posted by richard (5 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
ty. i am sure that sunny will bite back! but with your first sentence, the answer is quite simple. they would hae managed the tyres better! alonsos tyres went off at end of race, due to more wear by following in anothers slipstream and losing front downforce. maybe if he had held back and then made a push, he could have won, but we will never know. at the start of the season, i said that williams would make a step forward this year. as usual,many disagreed. well they have, but is it a wdc car? no, not yet. is pm a wdc in waiting? i doubt it. but on the day, evry thing fell into place for him , and he won.
Posted by richard (5 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments

Have Your Say Comments
Page 1 of 1260
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »
Have Your Say Comments

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.