Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -7471
Position in rating: 8647

Show Comments on:

richard

December 26, 2015 2:08 PM

F1 » Hamilton unconcerned by Mercedes axe threat


Taipan: In other Lulu related news he says when he's finished with F1 he wants to build schools for poor children.
i am trying very hard to picture lulu walking around displaying his builders crack, carrying a hod full of bricks as he struggles to work out why there are no dimples on his lego blocks to help him. man, i am trying, but i think that it is a lost cause..........

richard

December 27, 2015 11:53 AM

F1 » Mercedes taking Ferrari threat ‘very seriously’


ProfessorX: actually it's beyond any reasonable doubt that Kimi will take points of Vettel next year. Well, Torger did have a 'sizeable' stake in WIlliams, but not any more, any wonder why Susie isn't there any more? Why their cars are going slower this year?
kimi take points off seb? well, he would have to beat him to do that, and there is little chance of that. far more chance of nico taking points off lulu! as for wolff dropping his shares in williams....since when?

richard

December 26, 2015 3:10 PM

F1 » Aston Martin boss cool on move into F1


dannycoupe1: I bet that statement ruined Force India's and Johnny Walkers New Year Party! Lotus has never had their own engine that I can remember in F1? I started going in 1973 and watching it in the 60's can't ever remember a real Lotus F1 engine at the moment ? I could be having a Senior moment and forgot one ? have I ?
well, what about the lotus climax? that was a power unit developed entirely by lotus.

richard

December 25, 2015 8:12 PM

F1 » ‘Humble expectations’ for Renault on F1 return


RichC:
JimG: With the monetary problems that Lotus had this last season, I am wondering how far behind they will be on chassis development. After all, Lotus was having a hard time trying to round up enough funds to actually get to the tracks and race, so I would think that they would have had minimal funds for future development of their chassis for the 2016 season. Heck, they couldn't even afford to do much development on their 2015 chassis during the racing season. We do know that being stuck with the Renault boat anchor PU will be a big step back from the Mercedes PU that Lotus was using for the 2015 season.
Perhaps part of the deal with RBR requires them to sell Renault their latest spec chassis?
i take it that you have not read the rules?

richard

December 26, 2015 2:01 PM

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year 2015 - Full results


rob01: . you don't have a favorite driver.
oh rob. did santa not bring you your replacement blow up doll of lulu? but you are right as per above. i appreciate most drivers in f1, even your idols ferdi /lulu. but i do assess them on their abilities and merits. so if i favour kvyatt, verstappen, vettel, etc...so what? it is because they give more to the sport than others. and in the list, maldo would be around halfway up the list. he has speed, he takes chances, he doesnt give up etc etc

richard

December 26, 2015 1:01 PM

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year 2015 - Full results


JohnMarston: Oh look Richards favorite driver polled last. Wonder how he feels about it
well, i wasnt going to respond to this inane comment but had second thoughts...........i dont have a favourite driver, but unlike you, i do reckon that maldo is not the worst by any means. he is a magnet , its true, but many of his accidents are not actually caused by him. AND, he has more gp wins than many others on the grid. that cannot be too bad, can it? now , you can go back to your sherry.


Page 13 of 2161
« 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.