Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -7259
Position in rating: 7553

Show Comments on:


April 25, 2015 3:02 PM

F1 » Lewis Hamilton ‘inspired’ by BTCC racer brother

MrJones85: You really can't believe it? Well, I can. It's because he's LEWIS HAMILTON'S brother. You should know by now that any article associated with Hamilton on Crash will always get a certain amount of disagrees. It's really quite that simple. Now who wants to disagree with that? lol
nothing to do with that. there are those who are so simple minded that they can only press the disagree button to any comment, and think that it is hilarious.


April 24, 2015 6:07 PM

F1 » Nasr thinks Wolff is ‘prepared’ for F1 debut

richard: if she doesnt debut this year, then she will have no chance as she will not qualify for a superlicence. but susie just does not have the credentials to be an f1 driver (apart from being a shareholders wife !)
You may be right. But, I would still like her to get a shot. Here's a question? Is she any better than Max Chilton?
4 m4xie, for all his faults, had actually had some good results in other formulae....susie hadnt ! so if m4xie was not considered f1 material, how the hell could susie be considered?


April 24, 2015 1:02 PM

F1 » Wolff insists F1 is in good shape

rob talks about fishing and a conger appears :D anyway, i see that bernie is now proposing an option engine for 2017. possibly a twin turbo v6, for the lower grid teams. i have no idea how that would work though. imagine the outcry if an option engine won a gp, the main teams would all be crying foul, and complaining that they were paying for their prie engines and being beaten by a low cost alternative. and remember when an option engine was allowed before (turbos) ? they were ridiculed at first, and then began beating the na engines, forcing the other teams to then go down the turbo route. goes back to my previous suggestion....1000 bhp at rear wheels, and to hell with how it is attained.

Page 13 of 2037
« 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.