Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -7053
Position in rating: 7499

Show Comments on:

richard

April 10, 2015 1:04 PM

F1 » Red Bull boss reissues quit threat


didi is making a point, and he is right. red bull are in f1 for exposure and to win. they got their exposure and gave renault 4 wccs with a down on power engine. there is no point in rb pouring cash down the drain if renault are not going to pull their socks up. bmw, honda, and toyoda were all manufacturers who came into f1 to win. the didnt and so pulled out. ferrari have threatened to pull out as have merc. so is it allowable for them to make threats , but not rbr. if they do pull out, it would be a very sad loss to f1. but interesting that it is now didi making the comments, and not just horner and marko.

richard

April 09, 2015 11:05 AM

F1 » Vettel tempers expectation as he closes on Senna


MrJones85:
LiVio: Please stop these headlines about equalling records , there are 20 races a season with cars that dont break down anymore all comparables are void. The record books should be asterisk to show 6 races a season minimum increase
Exactly! Vettel and Hamilton could both win 80 races each and it won't make a difference. They will never be held in high regards like Senna. Schumacher is probably the closest in ability and even he is a distant 2nd. These comparisons maybe fun but, they're also ridiculous.
senna is not held in high regard by all and sundry. a driver who deliberately takes out his opponents and teammates, is not worthy of such idolatry!

richard

April 08, 2015 8:03 AM

F1 » Hamilton: There is always room for improvement


ProfessorX: really Sunny, do you really believe that? You do realize how easy it is to shift the weight of the car rearward right? It's an optimization game, and Merc STILL have it in the bank, more lateral movement and a larger envelope to play in. Ferrari are definitely improving, but what your saying makes no sense.
nutty. do you not understand? the weight cannot be moved except for a minimal ratio balance. the way they alter the balance for tyre degradation is to adjust the suspension geometry, or change downforce. and what insires you to claim that merc have a larger envelope to play in? they could well be on their opitmum at present and maybe the others have more to play with. ssssiiiiggggghhhhhh!

richard

April 06, 2015 7:43 AM

F1 » Sauber against fifth engine for ‘specific team wishes’


FireB: nealio: Translation: money is really tight at Sauber right now and we can't afford another PU.
what a silly comment. if a pu fails, it has nothing to do with cost. there is a PENALTY of grid positions! the teams signed up to using 4 units per car, and there is no reason to change this. if a team needs another, they just have to accept a drop on the grid. so sauber is totally correct.

richard

April 05, 2015 7:01 AM

F1 » Ferrari revival: Where it all went right


cecedecat:
goldenoldie: Off topic: On the first of April it was reported that Max Verstappen will swap places with Daniil Kvyat in order to bring the type of feed-back that RBR needs. IMHO this report could be right but not so soon, although a seat for the RB11 was foamed during pre-season testing in Jerez.
Reported by whom?
a spokesperson called lirpa loof!

richard

April 02, 2015 4:43 AM

F1 » Hamilton: What is Alonso thinking?


rob01: Toto knew about the purchase. He laughed and said Yes Lewis is talking with Ferrari. All this while working on lewis's new contract.
rob. there is a big difference between lulu talking to ferrari, and ferrari talking to lulu! i have talked to merc, i have talked to lotus, but that does not mean that i am being asked to drive for them! maybe he was just talking about buying a fiat panda?


Page 15 of 2028
« 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.