Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -5690
Position in rating: 7033

Show Comments on:


November 12, 2014 11:55 AM

F1 » Rosberg: I’m in good shape

taz. i dont condone driving a person off the track, but i do think that nico should hold his ground! it would be poetic justice. in austin, lulu again pushed nico off the circuit, but surprisingly there was little reaction to that move from the fanboys. they probably saw it as ok because it was lulu. now if nico had resisted and lulu had come off the worse for it, the forum would have been inundated with criticism of nico


November 12, 2014 9:18 PM

F1 » F1: Button would relish Alonso battle

rob01: Only one catch. Alonso does not allow or relish his number two doing any thing but donkey work.
So Ferrari signed Kimi to do donkey work? I don't think so.
He has been a donkey all year long. Have you not seen his results.
are you saying that he has had a hee haw season? and was he as stubborn as a donkey when he would not let your pal ferdi past, last weekend?


November 11, 2014 9:43 PM

F1 » Button: Money no issue in F1 future

kiwi. that was actually a tongue in cheek comment to wind rob up! e has a passion for ferdi! wiseguy. correct, but many of these newbies cannot see the real picture. vettel has suffered very badly this year, with reliability problems, and some appalling team strategy problems. but when he is running cleanly, he is still the faster driver. but some just do not want to acknowledge that, as you say, vettel, when in a car that has not been the best, has outperformed everyone else, and that was not just luck. it was skill. however ferrari obviously acknowledge his skill, and have opted him over ferdi, who many say is the best driver on the grid. that says something!

Page 16 of 1940
« 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.