Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -3881
Position in rating: 6749

Show Comments on:

richard

August 27, 2014 9:44 PM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’


clichy. do you really follow f1! if you did, ou would know why there is so much said about lulu. he may be a reasonably good driver, but to try and equate him to the others you mention is just plain daft. mansell great? no, he "lucked" into an exceptional car. clark just lucky? HAHAHAHA. stirling bitter about mike? HAHAHAHA. and how on earth can the wrong driver be leading the wdc? last time i checked, the driver with the most points was leading, and he is the right driver to be leading.

richard

August 28, 2014 9:17 AM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’


Clichy27: I've followed F1 for decades but have given up because people like you and Taipan bring your prejudices to the sport. Moss was bitter about Hawthorn, but to use your argument the driver with the most points wins. Moss is on record as saying Hawthorn didn't deserve the WDC (hahaha) Clark was a better than average driver who lucked into the Lotus drive because of his friendship with Chapman, he was never a great. You disparage Mansell, whatever. Hamilton is a great driver, you guys just bring your prejudices to the sport.
clichy, i pressed the reply button, but really , words fail me (for once!)

richard

August 28, 2014 2:06 PM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’


physics. i must have forgotten to press the submit button, but i was going to say that the imp engine was indeed used in f1. known as the coventery climax engine. forgotten the years but late 50 or early 60. i think that it was lotus who first used it. originally it was designed as a lightweight portable firepump. but alas, when they put it in the imp, they placed it in the rear along with its radiator. poor cooling saw most of them cooking themselves! surprised that there are many still where sunny resides.

richard

August 27, 2014 7:08 PM

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims


35edme: Petronas, the folk sponsoring the team issued a statement. Can someone at Crash post that statement . They are unhappy with someone and we'd all like to know with whom .
my reading of it is that they are unhappy with merc allowing this situation to develope into a media spat! they are not attributing any blame to either of the drivers. they are right. it is the MEDIA who are blowing it up, and unfortunately it is the partisan british media and some hanger ons.

richard

August 28, 2014 9:26 AM

F1 » Rosberg refuses to take blame


35edme: If Susie Wolff had been racing and had made a move like that how many on here would be calling for her head.
quite right. if susie had taken lulus line and tried to run nico off the road, we would indeed be calling for her head. and imagine if it had been vettel in lulus position? there would have been screams for him to be banned from sitting in any car ever again!

richard

August 28, 2014 9:12 AM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’


107SS2009: here4thesun2, For the last nine months I have been working on a 1/4 scale model side valve V8, one inch bore/one inch stroke, my own design, if and when it runs (first pop in our circles) I will be willing to offer it.
sunny. it looks like another rule that you dont understand :D engines are now v6 turbos. back to the drawing board, and make sure you remember where the yellow wire goes.

richard

August 28, 2014 10:25 AM

F1 » Kate Walker: Nico’s alleged thoughtcrime


nutty. give it up! you are only embarrassing yourself showing your complete ignorance of the rules as they are written and as they are accepted by all the teams. you may have self titled yourself as a professor, when you left secondary school, but all you are doing is showing yourself up. the rules are perfectly clear, and just because they are different to what you think should be the case, does not mean that they do not have to be obeyed.


Page 17 of 1884
« 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.