Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -7457
Position in rating: 7785

Show Comments on:

richard

June 10, 2015 11:43 AM

F1 » Horner defends Red Bull chassis after Ricciardo backlash


Giveaway: But its true, when you offer up your opinion for criticism, you are showing your colours on your painting.
of course that works both ways! but i dont know what colours facts should be represented with, but i do know that i do not like the colours that nationalism over facts presents. so if ricciardo becomes wdc over the next 100 years, i will eat my hat. mind you , i dont think that i will be around to eat it.

richard

June 10, 2015 7:42 AM

F1 » Horner defends Red Bull chassis after Ricciardo backlash


giveway. i have nothing against aussies. i have a number of relatives there, including close associates of the high commissioner there. so please do not paint an adverse picture of me. i just do not rate dr as highly as you do. as i said before, i do accept that some nationalistic pride is understandable, but if you read my older posts, from the start i said dr was not wdc material. i am consistent. and as for kvyat being told to pull his finger out? why did you not report the comment in full? both dk AND dr were given the same message , and were warned that there were two others performing better. and when dks car is performing reliabily, he is faster than dr.

richard

June 10, 2015 12:53 PM

F1 » Renault F1 future to hinge on Mercedes leniency?


mart993: If you don't let us catch up, we will take our bat and ball away. You reap what you sow I'm afraid!
not sure what a sow has to do with it. mind you, the renault engine is a bit of a pig! :D but your first sentence is relevant. if you are not allowed to catch up, due to the rules, why would anyone want to continue in the sport just to trail around making up numbers?

richard

June 10, 2015 11:50 AM

F1 » Renault F1 future to hinge on Mercedes leniency?


benignlyindifferent: Again, Horner appoints himself as Renault spokesman, despite the Renault brass meeting directly with Bernie and others a few weeks ago to ensure their position was accurately stated. At that time they stated they wanted to clear up the inaccuracies begin reported by people who were not spokespeople for Renault. Horner should be quiet.
come on! you are better than that! read the story...horner is just saying what renault have already declared publicly.

richard

June 10, 2015 10:28 AM

F1 » Alonso insists he is ‘not regretting’ McLaren move


hondas proper name is honda MOTOR company, as that is what their expertise is in...motors. remember their first foray into f1? they came in with a jewel of an engine and in their own chassis and it bombed. it was not until they put the engine in a lola chassis that they won. ditto with spirit and bar...the motor was good but the chassis was terrible. so they built their own chassis, which had promise but economics forced them out. i havent seen many complaints of their ice blowing up, but it is the correlation with other, non-honda parts that is causing problems. they are using an unique turbo and seals are failing, and that could be classed as hondas fault. but they will get there......

richard

June 10, 2015 7:44 AM

F1 » Sauber to investigate Montreal lack of pace


ProfessorX:
richard: lack of pace was unusual, no matter what colour the cars are! when seb passed nasr, he was away like a scalded cat...and that was in a straight line. ok, i know that ferrari had an upgraded engine, but there must have been 100bhp at least in the difference. could it be that they are using a different ers system? sunny might know.
or Sauber let the Ferrari by.
rack up another silly comment from nutty!


Page 17 of 2064
« 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.