Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -3936
Position in rating: 6759

Show Comments on:

richard

August 27, 2014 9:44 PM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’


clichy. do you really follow f1! if you did, ou would know why there is so much said about lulu. he may be a reasonably good driver, but to try and equate him to the others you mention is just plain daft. mansell great? no, he "lucked" into an exceptional car. clark just lucky? HAHAHAHA. stirling bitter about mike? HAHAHAHA. and how on earth can the wrong driver be leading the wdc? last time i checked, the driver with the most points was leading, and he is the right driver to be leading.

richard

August 28, 2014 9:17 AM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’


Clichy27: I've followed F1 for decades but have given up because people like you and Taipan bring your prejudices to the sport. Moss was bitter about Hawthorn, but to use your argument the driver with the most points wins. Moss is on record as saying Hawthorn didn't deserve the WDC (hahaha) Clark was a better than average driver who lucked into the Lotus drive because of his friendship with Chapman, he was never a great. You disparage Mansell, whatever. Hamilton is a great driver, you guys just bring your prejudices to the sport.
clichy, i pressed the reply button, but really , words fail me (for once!)

richard

August 28, 2014 2:28 PM

F1 » Horner not ruling out title challenge


it is best to never give up, but the likliehood is absolutely minimal, unless lulu gets more hissy fits. but then, i suppose that merc will finally back nico. benignly. have you not seen the progress of renault over the summer? many wrote off the pu from the start, but i was always optimistic about themgetting it right. now that it is close to par with the merc, i cannot see rbr moving. apart from that, with lotus going to merc, merc will have too many customers (according to the rules) and would not be able to supply any more teams. unless rb choose to develop the cossie, in their own name, or purchase the renault engine business and bring in new expertise and rebrand, then rbr will have renault for next year.

richard

August 28, 2014 2:12 PM
Last Edited 21 days ago

F1 » New chassis for Vettel in Monza


elswagger/rgt. shows how little you are aware of in f1. vettel is behind on points due to the myriad of problems that he has suffered this year. he has had a good car in only two races so far. look at spa...no practice and still gets 3rd on grid. races with a car that has guestimated settings copied fron ricciardos car, and possibly a cracked chassis. still comes fifth, passing three cars on the last lap. not too shabby. at least he didnt moan about his teammate, nor did he want to park the car.

richard

August 28, 2014 6:43 PM
Last Edited 22 days ago

F1 » Mercedes may need to change line-up – Webber


Elswagger: All I could see here, is a current World Champion been handed the biggest can of asswhooping you could imagine, Richard will come and tell us that Vettels car had problems. Let wait till Monza when Vettel gets a new Chassis, Engine, Gear box,Engineer, kit man, tea lady, new front wing etc and lets see what will happen.
RGT. yes, it has problems or did you not listen to the f1 news? but werent you the very one who was claiming that lulu was not beating nico because of all his "car problems" ? so now you obviously say that it was bs, and that nico is actually beating lulu on racecraft? what a turn around for you! interesting that toto has now called off negotiations on a contract for 2016.

richard

August 28, 2014 6:37 PM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’


AyrtonSenna: This cliche dude has got my back up actually. He probably doesn’t even know that Sir John Surtees won a title on 2 wheels. What a palooka. When lulu the great wins the titke this year, I will put him in the same class as Christian Danner. Both have nice ears.
possibly, but i havent noticed christian lowering himself to put some marbles in his lobes!

richard

August 28, 2014 2:06 PM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’


physics. i must have forgotten to press the submit button, but i was going to say that the imp engine was indeed used in f1. known as the coventery climax engine. forgotten the years but late 50 or early 60. i think that it was lotus who first used it. originally it was designed as a lightweight portable firepump. but alas, when they put it in the imp, they placed it in the rear along with its radiator. poor cooling saw most of them cooking themselves! surprised that there are many still where sunny resides.

richard

August 28, 2014 9:26 AM

F1 » Rosberg refuses to take blame


35edme: If Susie Wolff had been racing and had made a move like that how many on here would be calling for her head.
quite right. if susie had taken lulus line and tried to run nico off the road, we would indeed be calling for her head. and imagine if it had been vettel in lulus position? there would have been screams for him to be banned from sitting in any car ever again!

richard

August 28, 2014 9:12 AM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’


107SS2009: here4thesun2, For the last nine months I have been working on a 1/4 scale model side valve V8, one inch bore/one inch stroke, my own design, if and when it runs (first pop in our circles) I will be willing to offer it.
sunny. it looks like another rule that you dont understand :D engines are now v6 turbos. back to the drawing board, and make sure you remember where the yellow wire goes.

richard

August 28, 2014 10:25 AM

F1 » Kate Walker: Nico’s alleged thoughtcrime


nutty. give it up! you are only embarrassing yourself showing your complete ignorance of the rules as they are written and as they are accepted by all the teams. you may have self titled yourself as a professor, when you left secondary school, but all you are doing is showing yourself up. the rules are perfectly clear, and just because they are different to what you think should be the case, does not mean that they do not have to be obeyed.


Page 19 of 1887
« 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.