Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -7625
Position in rating: 7963

Show Comments on:


October 05, 2015 12:30 PM

F1 » Raikkonen: I wouldn’t be here if I couldn’t win…

ducfer: In 2008 he started better than Massa,strange enough he was still ahead of him way after mid season when Domenicali decided to shift his attention to Massa and Raikkonen endured four awfull gp's plagued with issues...there you have Massa missing the title by one point.In fact,Massa lost the title in Silverstone when he span no less than five times in the wet.
no, he lost the title when a fuel hose was left on. or...he lost the title when his engine blew when leading a race...or, he lost the title when timo went grass cutting. eliminate all these and he would have won by a mile!


October 04, 2015 7:53 PM

F1 » Rosberg not nervous in combat after Spa clash - Wolff

janhein: so how many different people are actually rgt? just curious.
i think that his count of aliases must be over 100 , and that is just in the last year! he also infects another f1 site, with a number of different aliases. one of his trademarks is his inability to spell, well, he is a civil servant! the other day, he didnt know how to!


October 03, 2015 4:26 PM

F1 » Ricciardo ‘expected better’ from Renault

Googolplex: Ricciardo happens to be the Messiah. He has brilliant white teeth regularly cleaned by Colgate and when in the same equipment as Vettel smashed him. These are undeniable facts.
googol. you are better than that surely? first of all, ricciardo uses BLANXX ! secondly,most knowledgable people know that riccardo did not "smash" vettel. vettel was subject to a number of questionable calls whilst running AHEAD of ricciardo. these calls put him on bad strategy and were prompted by the fact that rbr knew that vettel was leaving. they knew as early as april!

Page 2 of 2100
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.