Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -3336
Position in rating: 6516

Show Comments on:

richard

June 11, 2014 2:24 PM

F1 » Haas wants Patrick in F1 team


i think that a lot of you are being rather sexist in comments. whereas i dont actually hold out much hope for haas in f1, i dont think that danica would be too much out of her depth. not a front runner, but at least she would be lower midfield. she has experience at running cars in close proximity at 200 mph +, so i cannot see her being in anyway handicapped in f1. she has proven to have spatial awareness and to be able to stand the g forces etc. so if she was to be given a chance, let her try. after all, simone is a test driver, and danica is better than her. as regards designer for haas. he will be using dallaras, with a few add ons. not that that will bring him success, but i reckon that he will easly out caterham caterham.

richard

June 11, 2014 2:27 PM

F1 » Webber: Ricciardo win ‘a big step’


beastinblack: He is lucky that Mercedes deliberately infected their cars with that dodgy software on sunday in order to get Rosberg miles ahead of Hammy in the championship stats. Otherwise he would have come third.
i take it that you did not see merc try to knobble nico by giving him a slow pitstop, just to allow lulu to get ahead of him. and guess what? lulu threw it away!

richard

June 11, 2014 6:19 PM

F1 » Haas wants Patrick in F1 team


taz broached this earlier, and i had not heard about it. haas now says that he will be looking for a technical partnership with a manufacturer due to the move to customer cars.....???????. does he know something that we dont? has bernie given him some advance info? as far as i am aware, there has been no discussion on customer cars as yet. or maybe haas is just pinning his hopes on a vague possibility?

richard

June 10, 2014 4:13 PM

F1 » Hamilton: Montreal less frustrating than Monaco


forza. i think that it is you who needs to wake up. can you not get it into your head that the guy in front was the faster? nico had pole. he was on the inside of the first corner, lulu tried to win the race at the first corner and tried the long way around. to say that nico pushed him off is balderdash to the extreme. it was NEVER going to work. and then to say that lulu closed the gap? well if there was a gap, why was it there in the first place? because nico was faster. then lulu only got ahead of nico during a botched pitstop for nico, yet nico was up on lulus tail a lap later! if you dont understand basic facts, why display your lacking on an open forum?

richard

June 10, 2014 4:06 PM

F1 » Massa insists win was possible


michael. what an insulting comment to make about a driver! when massa came up behind seb, dr and perez, all running in close company, how did you expect him to pick off three cars in one go? montreal is known as a difficult track to pass even one car. then you criticise him for not being agressive enough, yet when he was agressive and went to pass out vettel and perez, you criticise him again! but for perez moving left, the move would probably have been fully successful, and you would be on here (not) saying what a brilliant move. poor lad cannot win with you, can he? average driver? far better than most others on the grid!


Page 20 of 1849
« 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.