Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -3878
Position in rating: 6747

Show Comments on:


August 25, 2014 1:34 PM

F1 » Rosberg v Hamilton: Have your say

morgan. i fully agree! to see toto and niki acting as judge jury and executioner, before any discussion or review, was ludicrous. niki even had tears in his eyes, so it was blatantly obvious whose side he was on. personally, i still say it was a pure racing accident, the same as happeed to others in the race (without all this hooohaaaa.) and the same happens in every race on the calendar. but if it doesnt happen to lulu, then nobody bats an eyelid. this is all media stirring.


August 25, 2014 1:29 PM

F1 » Lauda: ‘Lewis did nothing wrong’

tommy. your comments defy logic! have you read the rules about leaving room? obviously not! and as for nico being behind lulu when he hit him? well, if he was, he wouldnt have hit him!. watch the race....nicos front tyre was level with lulus head, and nico then had to drop back slightly. lulus rear tyre ran over nicos front wing. it was noit a case of nico being behind and running into the back of lulu!


August 25, 2014 3:55 PM

F1 » Lauda: ‘Lewis did nothing wrong’

cubik. the rules define what alongside means. and if the front wing is level with the rear tyre, then the car ahead must leave a cars width of space. before the clash, nicos front wheel was level with lulus head.....clearly well alongside. as lulu went across, nico slowedslightly, putting nicos wing into contact with the front of lulus rear tyre. nicos nearside were right on the edge of the track, and lulu tried to push him off. (i am not saying as a deliberate act, but as a defensive move). he expected nico to go wider but nico stood his ground and the slight clash happened. as you yourself says....stick with the facts..... and go and look at the overheads again!

Page 20 of 1884
« 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.