Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -7802
Position in rating: 8691

Show Comments on:


February 01, 2016 7:04 PM

F1 » Maldonado confirms F1 exit

DBL: That win is his only podium as well, a perfect pit & tyre strategy by Williams won the race with all other race rivals apart from Alonso and Raikkonen falling back with penalties. Hamilton on pole demoted to last on the grid, Vettel & Massa drive through penalties, Alonso's tyres were graining behind Maldonado and Raikkonen's behind Alonso. They couldn't get close enough out of the last corner to pass him on the start finish straight.
so? a win is a win...and he also had a third. that is better than most of the other drivers on the grid. and maldo was a gp2 champion, something that some other drivers have been unable to accomplish.


January 29, 2016 8:27 PM

F1 » Marko wants Renault to prioritise Red Bull over own team

nealio: With Marco feeling that Mercedes will dominate again in 2016 why would Renault back the Red Bull team before their own?
because red bull are far far more likely to be closer to ferrari and merc ! it would not surprise me to see kvyatt and possibly even ricciardo on the podium in 2016, but it is pretty certain that maldo or palmer will be lucky to even score points. so if renault want to gain some credence for their pu, it is far better to help any team that will give them the results they need


February 01, 2016 11:41 AM

F1 » Newey: Red Bull likely to lose more ground

Superhunky: Adrian loved it when it was all about his Chassis which were dominating... as his were indeed. He didnt think that was unhealthy..... The F1 history books show F1 has mosty been an *engine formula* so its nothing new
shows how little you know about f1! the formula has been mainly about chassis and aero....unfortunately.when the majority of cars were using the dfv, how do you think such things such as wings, ground effect, double chassis were invented?

Page 25 of 2183
« 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.