Show Comments on:

richard

June 15, 2013 1:25 PM
Last Edited 4 days ago

F1 » Pirelli unchanged as teams stymie plans


sunny. I stand corrected. but they also subsequently said that the info would not have helped them with their current car, if a 2011 car was used. re static friction. pcx also called himself PROF-X so he must be highly qualified.:D :D I guess that static friction could be applied to a car parked on the steepest part of the brooklands banking (or Monza or nordschleif) where the car is resisting sliding sideways!! hardly applicable on a modern circuit.

richard

June 15, 2013 1:31 PM

F1 » Hamilton: I can still challenge for the title


livemusik. to claim that newey is not the ultimate just because kimi did not win in a newey car, is just plain bumpf. have you not considered that the driver might also have something to do with it. newey can produce a championship winning car, but it has to be driven , to win. look at webber for example. webbers car is the SAME as vettels, apart from some preferences by one or the other. it s the driver that make the ultimate difference.

richard

June 15, 2013 11:25 AM

F1 » Ecclestone: Mercedes in the wrong


firestorm. merc have not been made to look like cheaters, they ARE! merc knew the rules about in season testing, and to think that they were suckered by Pirelli, is just plain unbelievable. I also drive a merc, (2011 e) and it is a heap! gearbox lousy, just had ecu and injection system replaced under warranty etc but that has nothing to do with the f1 team!

richard

June 14, 2013 9:23 PM

F1 » Vettel extends Red Bull deal


walrus. no, I never claimed to work for a tem, but I do have a nephew who does, so I usually get one invite per year. but to see the actual race, it is actually better to see it on tv! but giveway appears a little confused, having been in f1 for five years, and then says 18 years! and then chickens out of a meeting. maybe his team is an x box team?

richard

June 14, 2013 8:36 PM

F1 » Pirelli unchanged as teams stymie plans


mark. granted that merc will do everything they can to wriggle out of this, but I don't see any suppor for them appearing. interesting though, that there is talk that Charlie is possibly getting the shove. so could there be some evidence that he misled Pirelli and/or merc? if so, maybe merc can get off the hook, but there would still be the fact that merc knowlngly breached what every other team knew were the rules. also interesting that Pirelli have "decided" not to bring in the tyres that merc tested, due to other teams objecting.


Page 3 of 1599
« ‹ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  › »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.