Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -7440
Position in rating: 8638

Show Comments on:


January 29, 2016 10:29 AM

F1 » Marko wants Renault to prioritise Red Bull over own team

LaughingGas: Is he drunk?? Why would Renault do that when they have their own team??
well, i for one believe that helmut is correct. redbull have a far better chance of providing results. lotus renault have a poor car and renault have dilly dallied with their engine over the last few years yet rbr have performed and provided them with championships. you will probably find that rbr will have around double the wcc points of renault this year. remember honda? in the 60s they tried to produce their own car which had the most powerful engine and it was a failure, but then surtees put the engine in a lola chassis, and suddenly they were able to get results.


January 29, 2016 11:32 AM

F1 » Ecclestone sides with drivers over ‘flat out tyres' push

Yes Yes Yes Leave Me Alone: I'm not actually against Bernie as much as most seem to be. However daft his comments seem at times, he seems to genuinely want to improve the 'show' of F1. How about a compulsory number of pit stops? That eliminates the need to save tyres and stretch out stints... could it work?
how about NO pit stops so we have a proper RACE?


January 26, 2016 6:25 PM

F1 » Vettel top as Pirelli concludes wet tyre test

rob01: They should be the best with aero. Its their only focus and they spend hundreds of millions on it. Then sit and scream give me the best engine.
wouldnt you too if you were sold a pup? imagine you bought your 500 bhp ford mustang and found that it had been fitted with a 400 bhp unit? and renault are now freely admitting that they failed to provide rbr with a competitive unit and also admit that they did not spend the required time or money to try and improve matters


January 29, 2016 11:37 AM

F1 » ‘Trouble ahead’ as Ecclestone warns manufacturers

Jem: I am becoming very confused over all this. Just who was responsible for the introduction of these "power units". Can any reader explain.
i dont know who made the first suggestion, but neither ferrari or mercedes wanted them, but it was renault who forced the final issue. and look at how well they did out of it! if renault had have voted against it, then we would not be stuck with them.


January 28, 2016 7:32 AM

F1 » Vettel: A day in the wet is always fun…

goldenoldie: Quote: His second track outing in 2016 after testing a 2014 specification F14-T at Firoano earlier this month. As I am new to motorracing, can someone please tell me where Firoano is? Is this a new track? Always curious to learn something about motorracing. (Sorry, but i am a new kid on the block!) :)
did you not do geography in school? it is in atily!


January 27, 2016 3:58 PM

F1 » Vettel top as Pirelli concludes wet tyre test

rob01: They spend a few Hundred million more a year. They should beat them. And marko doesn't need to state the bleeding obvious to big his team up and belittle a partner.
well, that wouldnt be hard! renault were only spending on the engine before, and now that they have bought lotus for the princely sum of ONE DOLLAR, then their casts for this year will be pretty low. and as you actually admit, helmut is talking up his team.....that is his job! he is hardly going to big up merc, or lotus ,or ferrari, or ......

Page 3 of 2160
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.