Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -5654
Position in rating: 7024

Show Comments on:

richard

November 23, 2014 7:24 PM
Last Edited 1 hour 12 minutes ago

F1 » Hamilton takes second F1 title with Abu Dhabi win


i was also amused at sky commentators going overboard at the end, saying that lulu should really have 4 wdcs. the point is that he didnt, he was beaten by two other drivers. did he DESERVE " the wdc? not really. no outside competition, and he did not have to fight for his win today. but he " derserved" it due to having more points

richard

November 23, 2014 7:19 PM

F1 » Hamilton takes second F1 title with Abu Dhabi win


Don Hopings: No. He beat his team mate 11 races to 5 and his team mate did not make an on-track pass All Season and he didn't have to resort to treachery (Monte Carlo and Spa) and recovered from back of the grid starts and didn't out-brake himself. THAT's why it is thoroughly deserved.
wins do not make a wdc, points do, and i fully accept that lulu had the most points. but not too difficult when you have no competition apart from your teammate, and even he pushed lulu until the last race of the season. and dont forget, the call to lulu to let nico by, which he ignored. interestingly, brundle was quite open after the event, pointing out lulus good fortune and his pushing nico wide on at least three occassions!

richard

November 23, 2014 7:08 PM

F1 » Hamilton takes second F1 title with Abu Dhabi win


Don Hopings:
have you even read the poem? you should, then you wouldnt use it!
Did you want to see me broken? Bowed head and lowered eyes? Shoulders falling down like teardrops. Weakened by my soulful cries. ----- You may shoot me with your words, You may cut me with your eyes, You may kill me with your hatefulness, But still, like air, I'll rise.
now try verse 7! diamonds in his ears and elsewhere?

richard

November 23, 2014 3:21 PM

F1 » Hamilton takes second F1 title with Abu Dhabi win


congrats to lulu. his second wdc, but basically an easy one for various reasons, so to call it deserved is a tad over the top. nevertheless, he scored the most points and that is what matters. pity flip could not make up those vital few secs before the end!!! but in reality, this was one of the most boring races of the season, and i dont often make that comment.

richard

November 24, 2014 7:46 AM

F1 » Vettel ‘ready for next step’ after last Red Bull ride


david opie: I agree with ALL above comments, i just have ONE QUESTION though... DID Seb ACTUALLY end up starting behind Dan? OR... did Dan somehow end up lining up in-front of Seb, at the end of the pitlane?
vettel was ahead of ricciardo in quali, but as the bulls were excluded from quali, they had to line up as per fp3 times, where ricciardo was faster. so ricciardo started ahead.

richard

November 23, 2014 12:47 PM

F1 » Red Bulls to start from pit lane


sunny. it is still a lot of speculation at present. but apparently the wings passed the designated load test, at scruitineering. if the talk is true, it is the bracket for the upper plane of the front wing. but it is most odd, on another site, the movement of this bracket on the mercs was openly talked about and discussed. and video showed their front wing bending flatter at speed. and on the macca, apart from a similar item on their wing, there was a rubber spacer block between the pylon and wings, allowing air pressure to push down the rear of the wing in a lateral twisting motion! it would be interesting if the other front running teams were checked as well. to pick on one team is a bit odd. there is more behind this story than meets the eye!


Page 4 of 1939
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.