Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -3314
Position in rating: 6507

Show Comments on:

richard

July 05, 2014 2:15 PM

F1 » British Grand Prix - Qualifying results


was lulu trying to scupper nico! trying to slow him down so he would not get across the line in time, prompting nico to radio the pits to tell lulu to get a move on! looked pretty blatant to me. greast lap by seb and nico. at the half way point, seb was over 2 secs down, but still was able to be 3 secs faster overall. i didnt see nicos mid sector time, so dont know how much he made up. i didnt see lulus mid sector time either!!!!!!!!

richard

July 03, 2014 10:57 AM

F1 » Caterham F1 confirms change of ownership


kiwi. ridiculous comment about haas. he hasnt owned an f1 team, and has not had the slightest experience of it. and i reckon that there are many here who have a better idea of what is needed than he has. incidentally , even bernie (who has owned an f1 team) said that haas would have been better buyin an existing team. but then, i suppose bernie knows nothing either? taz. red bull made their money without f1. it is only didis love of the sport that has seen them entering f1, and shaking up the establishment. if they pulled out today, it wouldnt affect their sales or their profits.

richard

July 02, 2014 3:37 PM

F1 » Caterham F1 confirms change of ownership


superdowg. well they are , sort of! kolles was heading the consortium called corsa rosa, who were the second proposed newcomer accepted by bernie. so that particular entry will now be withdrawn. kolles my rename caterham team to that of his own consortium. i am not a fan of kolles who has made a muck of things in the past, so i have no idea if he will be able to make a go of this or not. haas should have done this rather than try to establish a new team.


Page 5 of 1848
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.