Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -7207
Position in rating: 7574

Show Comments on:


May 22, 2015 1:52 PM

F1 » Michelin confirms interest in F1 return

why do some continue to blame pirelli for the degrading tyres? it is NOT the fault of pirelli. they can provide tyres that could well last a full race and more, after all they provide tyres in wec. but fom/fia demand that they produce tyres that will only last a short period of use. it is deliberate so as to create pit stops and to provide "excitement" for tv viewers. IF michelin returned, they would be under the exact same strictures.


May 22, 2015 1:57 PM

F1 » Hamilton ‘just tweaking car here and there’

JunglistF1: And if charity comes from the heart and not the pocket then donating £5 or £5m should be the same as long as it came from the heart.
i think that you are missing the point entirely. a person who can easily afford a donation, cannot be compared to a person to whom even a small donation means a lot, and comes from the heart. i never admired senna, but he was an example of good charity, by giving most of his earnings to the slum children of brazil


May 22, 2015 12:41 PM
Last Edited 6 days ago

F1 » Hamilton ‘just tweaking car here and there’

Stuey99: All the top drivers have private jets mate. They can also spend the money as they see fit - do you want them to live in poverty and donate all their money? I'm pretty sure LH (like all the drivers) contribute a lot of cash to charity.
if a driver is earning 20m per year and donates 100k to charity, is that a lot? i would be pretty sure that most on here give a far bigger ration of their earnings to different charities. so who then is the most charitable? the person who can take 100k from their loose change, or the person who is earning a pittance and still gives maybe 5£ to the local hospital? charity comes from the heart, and not from the pocket!


May 22, 2015 12:44 PM

F1 » ‘The Strategy Group is not fit for purpose’

107SS2009: When Mr F1 calculated that he had the teams that natter in his bag, he came out with the grand idea of the strategy group, but now that he found out that the teams that matter had spit-out his fishing hook complete with the 2.4l twin turbo v8’s, he is the prim mover and the one fomenting and pushing that the strategy group is not good for F1/is not fit for the purpose, he is the one instegating/he is now behind the people who are saying that the strategy group is not fit for the the purpose, poeople which in the first place should not be and are not fit to be in F1 mostly because of Mr F1 himself. As long as F1 is not rid of it's onehalfcancer left in it things will never improve.
well, i see that hmrc are chasing mr e for 1bn in back taxes and penalties as a result of disclosures in the german case.


May 21, 2015 6:35 PM

F1 » Hamilton stays fastest before rain stops play

Soundofspeed: I am new here and the 16 disagrees is a bit astounding. What did I say that was so disagreeable? Nico has won here two years in a row - check. Nico was perfect in Spain - check What did I say that was offensive to some? I am confused.
welcome. you will soon learn! anything that does not laud king lulu will automatically be downvoted by his luvvers. you mentioned what is to them, a dirty four lettered!


May 21, 2015 12:51 PM

F1 » Ricciardo: It’s not just Renault…

Googolplex: Not sure where you got that from Rich. Helmut Marko was saying just the other day that Daniel is the equal of Seb in what he can bring to the team, but the team needed to give him the right equipment. Another bit of news for the anti Aus brigade, Webber and Seb are good mates nowadays and spent most of the flight out of Australia engrossed in conversation.
it was reported a couple of days ago on autosport (i think). marko said that verstappen and sainz were performing better than ricciardo and kvyat, and would be possibly stepping up to the rbr seats. both ricciardo and kvyat were told to raise their game. the comment was made after ricciardo criticised kvyat.

Page 6 of 2042
« 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.