Crash.Net User: richard

Comments rating: -6100
Position in rating: 7130

Show Comments on:

richard

January 14, 2015 8:55 PM

F1 » Ferrari: Engine development ‘first victory’


ty. not wanting to stray into sunnys territory, but the merc has advantage for several reasons. one of them being the correlation between electric and ice power. however, the position of the compressor part of the turbo does have an effect. it is sited to draw in cooler air which burns more efficiently than warmer air. that is why tuning firms on road cars, put in an intercooler to boost power. cooler air will provide more energy from the same amount of fuel as warm air. merc even use an exhaust header rather than a full manifold arrangement, to keep heat away from the compressor.

richard

January 13, 2015 4:18 PM

F1 » Vettel ‘will bring things to Ferrari we rather he didn’t’


Taipan: Ah so that's how fanboys decide to agree or disagree with a comment, they just look at the user name and if it's not one of "theirs" they hit disagree regardless of the content? I always suspected that but thanks for confirming it Sweaty.
ty. have you only worked that one out now? now you know that my figures show that i have the most attraction to the fanboys!

richard

January 13, 2015 8:23 PM

F1 » Vergne eyes 2016 Ferrari race seat


Googolplex:
richard: no, i certainly did not! i said that jev had equaled or bettered dr, which he had. i still beiieve that jev is a better driver. not as forceful, but still better.
You did say that, like it or not.
I have a reasonably good memory, and i have never downplayed jev, much to the chagrin to the antipodeans. and as i said, i have gotten quite a bit of abuse for sticking up for him.

richard

January 14, 2015 7:30 AM

F1 » Ferrari: Engine development ‘first victory’


rob01:
richard:
rob01: His next victory will be eliminating tokens as Red is going to need a bunch.
well, he got them increased from 36 to 48!
Your new found interest in Ferrari is very noticeable. Has your new red blow up doll arrived yet?
rob. you seem to have an obsession with blow up dolls! has your lulu one burst? but check my posts, i have always been a supporter of ferrari, since the 50's, so it is hardly a "new found interest"! and bex=cause of certain connections, i am also a follower of rbr. and i am a follower of williams. so what?

richard

January 14, 2015 8:45 PM

F1 » Vergne eyes 2016 Ferrari race seat


googol. you can only compare two drivers when they are driving the same cars. my point is, and always has been , that when jev and dr were in the same cars, then jev (in a race) was the slightly better. now dr is in a better car, you cannot compare the two, but given that rhey were evenly matched, despite jev having less experience, then it must be considered that if he was in a rbr, then he would again be pretty equal with dr. and if you believe that dr is wdc material, then you also have to believe that jev is also the same.

richard

January 14, 2015 6:54 PM

F1 » Vergne eyes 2016 Ferrari race seat


Googolplex: Richard, For some strange reason Crash saw fit to remove my post where I simply pointed out that on 17 May 2013, 26 August 2013 and on 3 September 2013 you had posted that neither DR nor JEV deserved a race seat at Red Bull. I hope Crash isn't playing favourites.
i had to trawl back to that date, but that is the point. i said that jev and dr were equal but that they were not ready for a rbr seat at THAT time. 2013!!!! and if you hadnt realised, jev had only a years experience at that time. he was MATCHING and even beating dr. and to reinforce tys comments, jev was taken out on a number of occassions when he was running confortably ahead of dr. this is now 2015.


Page 6 of 1967
« 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.