Comments by richard | Page 9 | Motorsports

Show Comments on:

richard

May 13, 2013 11:34 AM

F1 » Under-fire Pirelli concedes changes needed for the future

2012-2013. the 1992 races that you slate, were in fact that....RACES. where the fastest car/driver combo won. I take it that you are not actually interested in a RACE, so you are not actually a true fan, but just a tv lottery follower.

richard

May 13, 2013 11:29 AM

F1 » Spanish Grand Prix 2013: Alonso wears down the opposition in Barcelona

dan. you really should read more f1 sites! ALL teams, drivers, pundits etc are complaining about the tyres. understandably so. no good saying that any one team is complaining. in fact, the team with most complaints should be merc. I have defended Pirelli in the past, as they are providing tyres that fom and fia want. in fact, hemebry yesterday was quite angry about what they were being asked to provide, as it painted Pirelli in a bad light. however, delaminations are down solely to the manufacturing process. the HARD tyres could only perform for a few laps, imagine what would have happened had soft tyres been mandated? we would have had 10 stops or more!!!!

richard

May 13, 2013 7:39 AM

F1 » Under-fire Pirelli concedes changes needed for the future

what many seem to have missed is the fact that when vettel and kimi passed the marussia driven by bianchi, they could not drop the marussia. despite the superiority of the lotus and bull, the marusia on newer tyres was able to pace them. something wrong somewhere!

richard

May 12, 2013 4:38 PM

F1 » Spanish Grand Prix 2013: Alonso wears down the opposition in Barcelona

rob. you have it a-ways again. rbr made NO representations for a change of tyre. both pirelli and rbr have clearly stated that rbr were not one of the teams complaining.

richard

May 12, 2013 3:43 PM

F1 » Hamilton: We didn’t expect this

andy. yes, "comprehensively"! look how far "the greatest driver" was behind nico at the end! oh, and by the way, "the greatest overtaker" did manage to pass one car....that was the guitterez sauber.

richard

May 12, 2013 3:02 PM

F1 » Button and Perez see season slipping away from McLaren

salan. no agenda. always quoting FACTS, something that the fanboys hate. always available for good debate, but that is rarely seen here. there are one or two genuine fans here, and we have some great technical debate. so keep watching!

richard

May 12, 2013 2:59 PM

F1 » Hamilton: We didn’t expect this

wow! i guess he didnt expect to convert his 2nd place on the grid, into 12th at the end of the race, OR to be comprehensively beaten by nico?

richard

May 12, 2013 2:56 PM

F1 » Hamilton confident Vettel won't come to Mercedes

tesla. it always amuses me that fanboys make such wild claims such as "if lulu was in the same car as vettel, he would have whipped him". can you please explain as to how on earth you can make such a spurious claim? judging by lulus inability to whip his teammates, who many think are useless, then lulu would have been in for another drubbing!

richard

May 12, 2013 12:56 PM

F1 » Whitmarsh not thinking of quitting

marbles. thanks. yes, it is a pity that fanboys use this forum to try and boost their idol, rather than look a t the full f1 picture. we don't want f1 to be like soccer, where one bad result can see a manager fired.

richard

May 12, 2013 11:21 AM

F1 » Spanish Grand Prix 2013; Horner hails 'phenomenal' lap by Vettel

rob. in fact, seb used LESS tyres than anyone else and has three sets of unused hards available for the race. he is in a far stronger position than most others on the grid. on top speed, the bull is something like15kph down on the Ferrari, yet he still beat them, so the rest of his lap must have been pretty good.

Page 9 of 1569

« ‹ 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 › »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.