Recommended Comment

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

21 agree. 9 disagree.
Report Abuse
I think that the fact that these quotes came from 'The Sun' newspaper(?) says it all really. Who believes anything they read in there?

(Sorry you lot obviously do)
Posted by Shirley Knott (438 days ago)
Last Edited 438 days ago
Recommended Comment
Show Comments on:

Have Your Say Comments
1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Sunny i''d take you up on that but you''d have to pay the fare as well.... @Alonso No1 champ. True and he''s as arrogant as the rest of them. @Too good to tell, and theirs me thinking it was all to do with nazis... mind you I wouldn''t mind being pulled by one of them LOL
Posted by Shirley Knott (429 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
LOL... no I won''t. I''d probably get stopped by a police officer from the FIA and fined. But enough of the banter. I see even you didn''t disagree with my last post.
Posted by Shirley Knott (430 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Hi Sunny. No, he gave me some tablets and said if I still agreeing with you in a week I should go back and see him again.
Posted by Shirley Knott (430 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
All the best F1 drivers have a degree of arrogance, Schumacher, Senna, Prost and now Hamilton. They ALL need to feel and show they ARE better than the rest. Without it you get nowhere. I also noticed in the story (not attributed to anyone I see) "– as it is reported that some drivers are still unhappy about the clarity of the situation." So all the drivers KNOW and AGREE that Lewis was wrong and dserved the penalty even though THEY still don''t understand the rule themselves.... what else can I say... stupidity and ignorance at it''s best
Posted by Shirley Knott (430 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
@ sick of the moaners. There was no appeal in France because LH did not give the place back.... at Spa he did.....Spot the difference now?
Posted by Shirley Knott (430 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
5 agree.
Report Abuse
Speaking purely for myself. My main concerns are: 1) Why did it take 2 hours for the stewards to confirm the penalty? - If the incident had happened on the first lap the race would have ended before they had made a decision. 2) IF the stewards etc are happy with the 2 hour delay, why has it not occurred before? and will it occur again. 3) Why did the FIA hear the evidence BEFORE deciding that the appeal was inadmissible. 4) Why should it be accepted that the stewards cannot make a mistake? they have in the past. ALL appeals should be heard if only to maintain a resemblance of impartiality.
Posted by Shirley Knott (431 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Sunny, I must see a doctor, That is probably the most coherent post I have seen from you for a long time.And I NEARLY agree with you. 1) you're right the rules have been changed 2) will argue with you about 5 laps from the end, most drive throughs are notified within 2 laps, with the 3 laps allowed to serve the penalty that would JUST leave enough time to serve the penalty. 3) you're right - But why can't it be 4) again I will agree 5) Is the same as 3 6) Again I agree. All above is according to the rules.
Posted by Shirley Knott (431 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree.
Report Abuse
Quentin, It's always meant that, it's only in recent years that Max and his cronies have been making it so blatantly obvious
Posted by Shirley Knott (431 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
Does this mean that (for the sake of consistency) All complaints regarding infringements that incur a drive through penalty will take 2 hours to be decided?
Posted by Shirley Knott (431 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
@ Jose Maria Ribeiro. 1- 10 years ago LH would probably have been sacked for giving the place back.... but they were allowed to race in those days. 2- It is not so much the decision, it is more that McLaren are not allowed to QUESTION (appeal) the decision that is the problem for most of us. 3- I'll grant you that one.
Posted by Shirley Knott (431 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments

Have Your Say Comments
Page 4 of 16
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »
Have Your Say Comments

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.
 
Site Map
© 1999 - 2009 Crash Media Group
The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.

Contact Crash.Net  |  Advertise on Crash.Net  |  Our Privacy Policy  |  About Crash.Net  |  Get News Feeds  |  Need a Website?

Find car reviews on sports cars such as Ferrari, BMW, Porsche and many more.