Crash.Net User: Tesla

Comments rating: -911
Position in rating: 6550

Show Comments on:

Sukhoi 46

November 14, 2010 12:32 AM
Last Edited 1352 days ago

F1 » Vettel: That was a great lap


I have no doubt in saying that Sebastian would be a great Champion, considering his achievements in 2009 and 2010 at such a tender F1 age. But this year could be anyone's title. Most favorite now should be is FA because of his points advantage for sure. Let's see what's in store. Good luck to all of them, honestly :)

Sukhoi 46

November 14, 2010 12:19 AM

MotoGP » Ducati 'must improve' for Rossi to be Rossi


@Fact The very same crew migrated and working with the Ducati :) Don't you guys repeat the same mistake of writing him off once again! Why? Anyone remembers how critics cried (that he would never win another title!) when Valentino moved from HRC to Yamaha? So, I don't see any reason why he can't do it again with my favorite Bike manufacturer. Time is ticking and it's the biggest test for anyone so just relax and have some patience.

Sukhoi 46

November 11, 2010 10:48 PM

MotoGP » Ducati 'must improve' for Rossi to be Rossi


MotoGP 2003 season Honda 395 Ducati 225 Yamaha 175 Races won ZERO! MotoGP 2002 season Honda 390 Yamaha 272 Suzuki 143 Races won 2 MotoGP 2001 season Honda 367 Yamaha 295 It was YZR500 not M1 Suzuki 153 Races won 3 Point is, when did Yam had that Championship winning bike? Weren't they lacking a strong rider? Or something to do with no so solid bike? Whom are you trying to fool with such a snobbish argument by hiding behind a mask called true MotoGP fan :?

Sukhoi 46

November 11, 2010 5:51 AM

MotoGP » Ducati 'must improve' for Rossi to be Rossi


Dray - Guys ... Exactly what point you guys want to prove. Is it that Valentino Rossi is no good anymore or was never good and was aided by everything but his riding abilities????? I don't think any sane person who could say that Rossi is/was no good anymore let alone suspecting his competency. Some here always fancy in their own little imaginary world with their peanut size brains by deluding themselves. I wanted to start a good discussion but my mood turned off. F0cking m0r0ns! Anyway, am out of here.

Sukhoi 46

November 11, 2010 5:24 AM
Last Edited 1355 days ago

MotoGP » Ducati 'must improve' for Rossi to be Rossi


You illiterate As$, we were talking about 2003 season. Why is it so difficult for you to understand? Let me answer these too: @Were you watching MotoGP in 2002 and 2003? I'm into the racing from the Wayne Rainey days, saw him breaking the leg on TV. So, what now you f0cking m0r0n? @Or are you just a front runner, hanger on because of Rossi? Initially NO (Wayne, Kevin etc) but started liking MotoGP more because of Rossi and well as because of the Bikes and the Technology involved. Is that enough? @Are you a fan of MotoGP or just a newbie because you like the yellow tint and clown outfits? You should be a losing clown in your life. Well, I'm a fan of MotoGP. Much better than you, fucking idiot!

Sukhoi 46

November 11, 2010 5:22 AM

MotoGP » Ducati 'must improve' for Rossi to be Rossi


@They do it through set up work (weight distribution, suspension setting, geometry changes, etc) and if that doesn't work they have to produce hard parts such as new chassis, swing arms, etc. Words don't fix bikes - parts do. Riders don't design or make parts - engineers and designers do you f'king idiot. Did I ever say that Rider do design the part you ignorant f0cker? It was clearly you who couldn't able to understand the relationship between Engineering processes and the Riders contribution. I always mentioned that it would be a two-way collaboration so where was the f0cking problem? lsimanjorang, are you talking to me or a pimp of Dog who knows to click instant Agree/Disagree? :p


Page 15 of 106
« 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.