Crash.Net User: RSMick

Comments rating: 1281
Position in rating: 142

Show Comments on:


January 19, 2015 8:33 AM
Last Edited 313 days ago

MotoGP » Satellite ‘winning packages’ in MotoGP 2016

Tetley: Yes I did. Ooops. Even the damn spellchecker didn't flag that. It's fortunate that the subject was grammar, not spelling.
Should one who criticises others for their poor grammar (even though they are American) be using words that they need a spell check? Unless of course they may be dyslexic, the letters 'banale' are in fact is recognised by the spell check as incorrect.
Tetley: You dare diss another's English?
Should that be a capital 'D' for a town in Norfolk if we not allowed to use poor grammar? That also should be at least "You dare TO diss another's English?" if not 'how dare you'. Strange to be all condescending about this when Brain was merely making a point about a sentence being incomprehensible, we are not expecting perfect English but now starting on punctuation, this is an area you really should not criticise!


January 18, 2015 3:00 PM

MotoGP » Satellite ‘winning packages’ in MotoGP 2016

Tetley: "You mind deciphering that blob of letters into something coherent." When criticising someone else's use of the English language, it is banale for the writer to include schoolboy grammatical errors in his own critique. I'm guessing that the question should start "DO you mind ..." or "WOULD you mind ..." And because the "sentence" is a question, there ought to be a question mark at the end. Resorting to criticism of another poster's English grammar while avoiding the actual, relevant content of their comment is puerile and is a definite sign of losing the real debate, as is lewd inappropriate insults such as "swinging on Rossi's *** sack". Such caustic, inflammatory comments merely indicate the poster's propensity to escalate debates into arguments. Q.E.D.
Did you mean to write 'banal'?


January 10, 2015 10:08 AM
Last Edited 323 days ago

MotoGP » Amazing Marquez ‘rides MotoGP like dirt track’

The trouble is PCXMAC is unless you read the different accounts or go to/watch the races and investigate, then filter, thinking for yourself is all its ever going to be. Do you want a race series where no one makes money?

MrStinky: Perhaps he's saying that the top teams can afford better electronics and electronic engineers
The emphasis is going to be on the analysts more than anyone else involved in the ECU, no further transducers, sensors or actuators can be used outside the set I/O. Parameter changes will all it will be, but which ones and how much is the key. Nothing new from the top level to club racing in all motor sport, and most other you have the have and have nots. Obviously the best riders will have!

Page 16 of 181
« 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group | Built by Accelerate Agency

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.