Crash.Net User: RSMick

Comments rating: 892
Position in rating: 135

Show Comments on:

RSMick

March 11, 2014 1:46 PM
Last Edited 169 days ago

MotoGP » Ducati 'not happy' with Factory 2 development


Its like trying to suggest that a guy who could fly a Sopwith Camel the best would definitely be the best Eurofighter Jet pilot, and vice versa.
You have been there before, without its onboard computers the Eurofighter would fall out of the sky.
No offense but how did Rossi ride around the problems on the Ducati...
He didn't, but Stoner did

RSMick

March 11, 2014 6:36 PM

MotoGP » Ducati 'not happy' with Factory 2 development


TalentFan: Who else is in the game except Honda & Yamaha then?
Its not Yamaha's or Honda's fault Suzuki, Ducati, Kawasaki etc, cannot build a bike to match theirs, they are a business trying to sell bikes AND technology. God forbid the internet was around in the late 70's you would have been on Honda's side and against Suzuki and Yamaha. Blimey think of poor old Cagiva, Paton, Librenti, Fior in the 90's, Kawasaki have always been crap apart from a few seasons with Ballington in 250/350. Its other manufacturers job to catch up, BMW have the resources but not the will. As for your question on Forward, its clear you are not reading any of the actual facts you can read on many web-sites, in my opinion.

RSMick

March 11, 2014 1:13 PM

MotoGP » Ducati 'not happy' with Factory 2 development


Talentfan Just look at the top riders past form and how quick they learn. Take Spies, same kit as Lorenzo but could not get near. Dovizioso, never equalled Pedrosa's success and Dovi is an excellent rider. Even go back to Ukawa, just could not match Rossi, Checa could not match Biaggi. The top 4, Aliens as most like to refer to them (5 if you include Stoner) have an ability to ride round any problem, if these aids you go on and on and on about are not correct you wouldn't know as they ride round them. This is something Doohan used to have massive respect for Rainey, the difference between him and Cadalora, who when things were spot on could beat anyone, Rainey would ride around the problem. You only have to watch track side to see the difference in these guys, if you can't then you cannot spot talent.

RSMick

March 11, 2014 8:07 AM
Last Edited 170 days ago

MotoGP » Ducati 'not happy' with Factory 2 development


And again RSMick has condescendingly informed me on several occasions that I am seriously overestimating the scope and effects of the electronics the top Factory teams have. REALLY?
No, what I have been saying is that take the electronics away from the top riders and give them the same as everyone else, the results will not change. A fast rider is a fast rider and they didn't get their top rides riding at the back in lower classes. None of the factory riders with the exception of Crutchlow have used rider aids on the way to Motogp. Try taking a breath before you right something, you asked for external evidence I gave you a quick example, although an opinion, I have told you before, 'use twitter'. And please stop using 'Mick' 'Mick' 'Mick' all the times in your ramblings, just put it at the beginning, it really reads like someone 'on the edge'

RSMick

March 11, 2014 7:12 AM
Last Edited 171 days ago

MotoGP » Ducati 'not happy' with Factory 2 development


TalentFan: V poor effort. Shows no real effort or detail. No supporting evidence. 1 out of 10. See me after class.
motomatters.com/opinion Not a fan of Emmet but a well written piece. If you want to see Yamaha personels response to the Ducati farce then pay your money to Motogp and look back to the last Sepang test videos. I am still waiting to see you for that bet


Page 20 of 133
« 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.