F1 » Ferrari 'lagging behind' on KERS development.

Dice - you're fine example of the ''now, now, now, me, me, me, society' we now appear to live in. So what if news is a few days old? I still haven't read all of Sunday's newspaper yet... As for Ferraris KERS device. No worries, Ferrari's system wont work so they wont bother putting it on their cars, several races in the MaFIA will ban it thereby disqualifying all cars with it fitted making it a 1-2 for Ferrari's.... for the previous races. Oh dear.... I've just given the MaFIA an idea. Sorry all! Oh, and aren't Force India talking to McLaren??? That'll give Spanky Max another team to try and bully...

V8 » Radisich reveals true extent of injuries.

Get well soon Paul!! Been a few years since I last caught you - Phillip Island 2001(?!?), but was also great seeing you in BTCC in the 90's. Hope to see you back in a car as soon as you're comfortable.

F1 » In-car footage released of Fuji F1 incidents.

Clip & link fine for me, though it shows nothing we didn't know. A) It was Hekki that ran Kimi wide at turn 1. If Hekki had been penalised so should half the field behind him. Why Lewis was penalised only the MaFIA will know. B) Massa ballsed up his turn in, allowing Lewis past, then Massa drives into him. Correct penalty. C) Massa has his blinkers on & hits Seb. Certainly not the other way round. Incorrect penalty & buy stewards glasses... I honestly can't believe anyone could say anything differnt - it's all OBVIOUS!!! Does anyone know the names of the stewards at Japan?? - would like to find out their history. I.e - Spa's stewards were just 'returning favours' to Spanky Max.

F1 » Hamilton's move 'arrogant', admits Stewart.

Mucking Fuddle - 100% agree... I watched the race still drunk from the night before, I though it was me getting the cars mixed up (Hekki & Lewis). It certainly wasn't.... *Hekki* ran Kimi wide, not Lewis, and personally I don't think Hekki should have been penalised either. A racing incident on the first corner... that's all it was, and it happens nearly all the time with no pentalities being handed out. So why now? = MaFIA.

F1 » 3 men, 2 rounds, 1 crown - who to take title?

1) Hamilton 2) Kubica 3) Massa Or am I being a bit optimistic the FIA will allow that? WHOEVER wins this season has been tainted by 'made up' results.

F1 » Hamilton storms to Japanese F1 pole at Fuji.

I'm going to be checking the F1 website every hour 'til the race to see what excuse they use to push Hamilton back down the grid. FIA rules Chapter 34.523, paragraph 6351.32, sentance 4321.7654: Thou must not smile in wry fashion at a Ferrai driver when being weighed after qualifying. Dam... shouldn't have said that - the MaFIA are now going to look at the evidence....

F1 » Mosley steps up cost-cutting campaign.

All Spanky Max is doing is stating the bleedin' obvious. AS by far the majority wish for, he should get out of F1, and 'spend more time with his family' as they all do, oh, hang on, I mean 'spend more time with his mistresses'. The guy is a *joke*.

F1 » Canada loses Formula One slot.

Drop Montreal & keep Valencia?!?!? That's plain *stupid*.

F1 » $1 million incentive for fastest F1 Friday time?

Erm..... they want something to spice it up a little? Let's think.... erm... end of session Demolition Derby???

F1 » Montezemolo: Singapore circus 'humiliating'.

Got to agree with di Montezemolo that if it wasn''t for the saftey car (& cars on different pit stop strategies) it wouldn''t have been an exciting race. F1 needs to watch out that - it''s loosing the ''overtaking'' & a bit too much emphasis is glitz & glamour these days. Singapore was certainly ''spectacular'', but comparing *the circuit* Silverstone has to better for *racing*.... and it''s leaving the calender....???? It all makes as much sence as the banking system.