Crash.Net User: mark turner

Comments rating: 108
Position in rating: 858

Show Comments on:

mark turner

March 30, 2010 2:26 PM

F1 » Palmer 'wouldn't rule out' Donington purchase


it had nothing to do with his background. The man is incompetent as history has proven. the going was always going to be tough, although he had the dream and the ambition, gillett didn't have the resources, the ability, the money, the talent or even the time to live his dream. i'm not knocking gillett because of his ambition. he is being knocked because of his stupidity and naivety.

mark turner

January 23, 2010 12:52 PM

WSBK » Silverstone takes Donington Park slot


I disagree that Silverstone is monopolising everything. There are only four circuits capable of hosting this size of event Rockingham (noise restrictions) Brands (ditto) Donington (in pieces) and Silverstone. Brands doesn't want world superbikes. Where else can it go? Brands has Superleague, BSB, BTCC (2 events) WTCC, Auto GP, DTM, Trucks, F3/GT Silverstone has the 2 GP events, Superleague, WSB, BTCC, Le Mans, FIA GT, F3/GT, BSB. I consider that a reasonable split, especially since it is the only circuit upto the grade.

mark turner

December 22, 2009 2:49 PM
Last Edited 1773 days ago

F1 » Silverstone rejects British GP ticket price claims


I see that Chris Sylt of Formula Money has been using fag packets instead of calculators again. It amazes me how many people grasp only one point of an argument and can only think digitally. (1 or 0, On or Off, Yes or No) It assumes that the fee increase will be directly passed on to the ticket prices. There are no other factors considered. Concession stand fees, catering, hospitality, a debenture scheme (one that works instead of Donington's Pie in the Sky) Please try to remember that there is never just one answer to a problem.


Page 1 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.