Crash.Net User: shamarone

Comments rating: 984
Position in rating: 157

Show Comments on:

shamarone

March 23, 2015 12:51 PM

F1 » Max Yamabiko: Decoding Ferrari’s power unit shift


re: "According to senior team members the MGU-H was not able to harvest as much energy as it should have done from the turbocharger and that led to reduced power overall during races" correct, they weren't "driving" the turbo. re: "On top of that the combustion chamber was not as good as it should have been and as a result that has been fully reworked..." ...so as to better "drive" the turbo. re: "Notably the new exhausts feature heat shields and, for much of 2014, the Ferrari used bare metal exhausts which must have cost a notable amount of power..." ...and reduced what was available to "drive" the turbo. see crash, you now have confirmation from none other than FERRARI that what i said was in fact correct.

shamarone

March 20, 2015 6:36 PM

MotoGP » ‘The GP15 is a real Ducati’


re: "The truth is that nobody can make Trellis Frames where any two frames give identical results out on the track." truth is, they never tried. truth is, 29 championships were won over 20 years by 17 different riders using 4 unique trellis types across 3 different series. truth is, it is best to NOT "parrot" information from any individual I've routinely debunked. when a spy pic was snapped showing FOGGY (that's right King Carl) testing a 996 fitted with a DSS like 15-16 years ago, it was suggested the SSSA could no longer be made to work...? right then, along came Gianandrea Fabbro (as if inspired by s1 himself) returning to his drawing board and declaring, "we'll just see about that!". (could someone please translate those words, when you hear it in Italian it sounds much better)

shamarone

March 20, 2015 3:22 PM

F1 » Do Honda’s issues harm more than just McLaren?


re: "try reading the comment! it is the PU that is revolutionary it is the PU that is revolutionary" try being something other than a laymen. whenever the term "power unit" is used in F1, they mean the ENGINE. the complaint here is about "engine regulations" and fuel. notice, this is vastly different than if you heard the specific terms "KERS", "MGU", or "ERS" being used... which you did NOT. this is Formula 1, not all electric Formula E... not yet anyway.


Page 11 of 638
« 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.