Crash.Net User: shamarone

Comments rating: 1178
Position in rating: 94

Show Comments on:


August 26, 2014 6:29 AM

WSBK » PTR scraps WSBK plans, looks to BSB

re: "MotoGP stands to gain if WSBK falls through the floor" MUUUHHHAAAAHHHA...!!! (maniacal laughter with Spanish accent as hands rub together) re: "Racing and competition, and the quality and depth of field is sold out in WSBK & MotoGP so that Factory teams can dominate, while private teams either cant afford to be there at all, and/or can only hope to be grid fillers." ah yes, I also remember the first time I learned that life wasn't fair. (hand rubbing old-timer chin) iirc i was 10 years old...? dad hit me with that little chestnut. floored me, I was not a happy camper. don't feel bad, still have trouble with it all these years later me self. btw... (sound of fingers rhythmically rapping on desk) s1 awaits news of the bimota debacle (he only called from the very beginning) to drop. (sound of fingers rhythmically rapping on desk)


August 27, 2014 4:42 AM

MotoGP » No British MotoGP ride for Colin Edwards?

re: "Its a shame that modern times and contracts will almost certainly see CE gagged from actually telling the world what its really like in MotoGP, and the truth about just who gets what, and who is allowed to do what and where." you kiddin' me...? this is Edwards we're talking about here, there hasn't been a contract written that could gag him. there's rules for TEXAS, and then there's rules for everybody else.


August 26, 2014 5:40 PM

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims

re: "they have played both drivers by favouring nico" no, they DIDN'T favour nico, nor did they favour lewis and that's the problem. they were supposed to make a CHOICE. they hoped to get away with NOT choosing and that it would "magically" all work out...? this isn't anything new btw, we only do this every day in our personal lives. in Merc's defense, this was probably due to wholly benevolent reasons. fairplay to their intentions. unfortunately, life/reality/universe (whatever you want to call it) doesn't permit this. anytime you say NO to something, you're automatically saying YES to something else whether you realize it or not. damned if they did, damned if they didn't. in this case what they said YES to (unbeknownst) was ANARCHY and CHAOS... and this is EXACTLY what they've got.

Page 12 of 569
« 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.