Crash.Net User: shamarone

Comments rating: 1212
Position in rating: 89

Show Comments on:

shamarone

August 28, 2014 5:16 AM

MotoGP » Rossi ‘closer to goal’ heading to Silverstone


re: "It looked to me like MM's steamroller was stopped not by any change in his riding, but in him lacking grip at Brno. His bike looked unsettled and struggling to turn in and hold a line (relatively, it still wasn't a Ducati), and also on corner exit." 1 word... settings. re: "Weirdly, DP's bike was great, when previously he seemed to have grip issues elsewhere like MM had at Brno." hey, how about that. what are the odds that Dan's kit would suddenly be SPOT ON at the EXACT moment that Marcus' went pear shaped...? 1 in a million...? 1 in 10 million...? I know one thing, if someone named Dani Ramal had taken themselves and a boat load of cash to the Roulette wheel that evening, they'd be retired. in all my years of watching racing, I personally can't recall a single instance of luck like that...? just sayin'.

shamarone

August 27, 2014 4:42 AM

MotoGP » No British MotoGP ride for Colin Edwards?


re: "Its a shame that modern times and contracts will almost certainly see CE gagged from actually telling the world what its really like in MotoGP, and the truth about just who gets what, and who is allowed to do what and where." you kiddin' me...? this is Edwards we're talking about here, there hasn't been a contract written that could gag him. there's rules for TEXAS, and then there's rules for everybody else.

shamarone

August 26, 2014 5:40 PM

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims


re: "they have played both drivers by favouring nico" no, they DIDN'T favour nico, nor did they favour lewis and that's the problem. they were supposed to make a CHOICE. they hoped to get away with NOT choosing and that it would "magically" all work out...? this isn't anything new btw, we only do this every day in our personal lives. in Merc's defense, this was probably due to wholly benevolent reasons. fairplay to their intentions. unfortunately, life/reality/universe (whatever you want to call it) doesn't permit this. anytime you say NO to something, you're automatically saying YES to something else whether you realize it or not. damned if they did, damned if they didn't. in this case what they said YES to (unbeknownst) was ANARCHY and CHAOS... and this is EXACTLY what they've got.


Page 3 of 560
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.