Crash.Net User: shamarone

Comments rating: 948
Position in rating: 147

Show Comments on:

shamarone

December 18, 2014 5:06 PM

MotoGP » 2016 MotoGP fuel limit agreed


re: "The ever-shrinking MotoGP limits have made fuel-saving technology a key ingredient for track success, as well as relevant to road machines. Honda is especially keen to 'challenge' its engineers in this area." okay Honda, nothing's stopping you. go ahead, keep challenging YOUR engineers, but leave me and my fuel capacity the f@#k out of it.

shamarone

December 18, 2014 6:28 PM

MotoGP » ‘Healthy’ MotoGP facing ‘optimistic future’


re: "but little action that really DOES anything to make Mfrs have less control over the outcome, and less dominance." that's cause the error came in the ASSUMPTION that "beggars" (ie. people with talent to manufacture f@#kall) would ever get to dictate to skilled producers the way of things. while they don't let on, the manufactures KNOW they're in this "power position" too. the only people who don't know it...? are the beggars (ie. Dorna, the FIM, the laymen, the fans, etc) so any responses of shock/horror/confusion to this revelation are completely understandable.

shamarone

December 18, 2014 6:11 PM

MotoGP » ‘Healthy’ MotoGP facing ‘optimistic future’


re: "YOUR song certainly stays the same, bro" PRECISELY... and when something passes the "litmus test" of time, that's your first clue to it's accuracy... it's DURABILITY. the burden now rests with you the reader (you, not me) to smarten up and realize the definition of "change" does not mean doing (fundamentally) the same things over and over and expecting different results. take my being on about Suzuki. for more than a decade my opinion has been 180 DEGREES OPPOSITE that of the gullible masses. I've been the lone voice of reason both here and abroad. I DID NOT WAIVER. fast forward to the weekend of Valencia 2014, Suzuki returns from 3 year holiday and promptly begins scattering engines with RECKLESS ABANDON... only NOW does everyone see more clearly.

shamarone

December 18, 2014 5:38 PM

MotoGP » ‘Healthy’ MotoGP facing ‘optimistic future’


re: "your talent, intelligence, organisational ability and keen commercial insight are wasted here. We are not worthy." you are correct sir...! (Ed McMahon voice) re: "Surely you should be turning your vast knowledge of 1000 years of history to solving your Government's disastrous home and foreign policies?" and what makes you think this is my "home" as opposed to just my current address...? LOL unbeknownst, these are 2 different things aren't they. voting rights are a luxury extended only to citizens. re: "That's where you are really needed. Go there." except I've made a conscious choice to be HERE helping you gents solve the problems you haven't been able to solve (clearly), and helping the rest NOT be less than what they think they ought to be.

shamarone

December 18, 2014 6:30 AM

MotoGP » ‘Healthy’ MotoGP facing ‘optimistic future’


re: "But Dorna's vision was very different to the pre-2012 regulations." and s1's vision is different further still. Q: how so s1...? A: 'cause it seems only s1 generates vetted plans that when put into practice ACTUALLY achieve their goal. unlike the masses, all else gets thrown in the bin. hate to break it to ya (again) but the "single rules" set is nothing more than an idealistic fantasy. it's unworkable. in a 1000 years of recorded history, we don't see any evidence of where man solved any problem that plagued him by FIRST ignoring reality...? in fact, quite the opposite. gentlemen, the reality here is there will ALWAYS be two classes of competitors. factory and satellite, producers and consumers, ie. the people who MAKE the kit...? and the people who RELY on someone else to make the kit for them. any rules set that doesn't acknowledge this pre-existing condition...? is a rules set destined to court FAILURE. mark these words for the passage of time will see them true.


Page 6 of 614
« 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.