Crash.Net User: nealio

Comments rating: 2142
Position in rating: 68

Show Comments on:


May 22, 2015 3:09 PM

F1 » Hulkenberg blames ‘timing’ for missing top drive

Well Nico has good company in Alonso since 2007! And once the "strategy group" does away with the independent teams it will become worst. Drivers are going to get to the point where F1 is no longer an option to further their careers. The scenario now is that a rookie driver has two seasons to make it in F1 and that means competing for the championship during that time and beating your teammate and drivers in better cars than you have. If he doesn't show these results he is gone and another hopeful youngster take the shot. The old guard (which includes Hulkenberg) survive because of seat-time in F1. With the insane limits on testing there are few who have the talent to drive F1 seriously and these older drivers are the bones the new boys sharpen their teeth on.


May 22, 2015 2:56 PM

F1 » Drivers cautiously in favour of refuelling return?

What’s unpredictable about cars passing because of pitstops? During the last era of refueling the races were processions and very often the only passing was done at pit stops. It’s much more of a challenge for a driver to have to react to the changing fuel load and it’s effects on the car over a full race distance than to go back to the sprint -stop -sprint -stop of the Schumacker era. The reason older drivers cotton to the idea is they think it will advantage them over younger drivers who have not experienced that style of racing. It’s also ironic to create a formula with power units 50% more efficient on fuel are required to take on fuel during a race. That is just a super lazy and jaded way to manipulate the series.

Page 13 of 93
« 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group | Built by Accelerate Agency

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.