Crash.Net User: Dan The Man Agustan

Comments rating: 425
Position in rating: 451

Show Comments on:

Dan The Man Agustan

December 16, 2015 12:44 PM

WSBK » World Superbike set for Saturday afternoon race in 2016

peppone: So let's recap - Dorna have apparently 'consulted' with everybody EXCEPT those that the series was intended for, the paying fans. Nothing new there, these folks in positions of 'influence' did not get there by taking on-board the views of others. Of course it's an utter disaster waiting to happen - I pity those people that need to work (or even leave the house) on a Saturday. Given that MotoGP has high technique but (mainly) low racing and is seemingly dominated by kids whose parents apparently attempt to achieve glory through their offspring I do wonder where we will be in a few years time. Likewise this has nothing to do with 'sport' and everything to do with money. But then again, of course that's why we all ride motorbikes, isn't it - love of cash ? Obvious really...
Couldn't have said it better myself, and didn't. This is by far the best reply yet and i completely agree with you.

Dan The Man Agustan

December 22, 2015 12:54 PM

WSBK » World Superbike set for Saturday afternoon race in 2016

Motojunky: We (the fans of motorcycle racing) have mostly been thought of as 2nd class citizens by the general public. Now Dorna has jumped on the bandwagon by not taking us into consideration. Never before have I seen such a unanimous response to an article on CRASH all saying the same. Let's hope they (Dorna) have the backbone to consider the die hard people that actually go to the venues, instead of pandering to the marketing people who can only see the dollars in TV rights and advertisement. Money talks, so I doubt we will be considered.
I agree completely. We will not be going to any races next year and I will not pay for a subscription to watch it either. Shame we've been going every year since the late 90s.

Dan The Man Agustan

November 28, 2015 9:35 PM

F1 » Hamilton explains change responsible for dip in form

here4thesun2: “What we have will go on to next year. I think they said they [Mercedes] don't think they made the car particularly slower, but it definitely isn't faster. And we can't go back to what it was before because they don't want to go back to what it was before.” Not sure what he means here, but I don't think he knows what he means either. This says Merc made a change to make the car slower and are happy to remain slower. And that Merc do not want to revert because they are against reverting on principle.
Or for legal reasons?

Page 1 of 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.