Show Comments on:

Johan Mulder

September 19, 2012 3:14 PM
Last Edited 248 days ago

WSBK » 2011 data little use for Checa in 2012


re: shamarone "ummn, they did... for grandprix... you may have heard of it...?" And your point is? No-one forces Ducati to build 2-cylinder superbikes. Has anyone looked at the racewins this season? Aprilia: 6 Ducati: 6 BMW: 6 Kawa: 3 Honda: 1 Please tell me. Which brand is superior? Exactly: NONE! Ofcourse they liked 2011 better: Ducati: 16 Yamaha: 6 Kawa: 1 Aprilia: 2 ... but hell, Ducati can't have it all like they want.

Johan Mulder

September 19, 2012 11:24 AM
Last Edited 248 days ago

WSBK » 2011 data little use for Checa in 2012


A 40km/h difference? Where would that be? Daytona oval? Some random results: Phillip Island - massive straight. Race 2: Checa: 311,6 (Winner!!, - no slipstream!) Biaggi: 324,6 Haslam: 321,8 Monza - massive straight Race (a bit sh*tty, i know) Checa: 308,2 Biaggi: 324,7 Sykes : 315,2 (winner!) Haslam: 318,3 Moscow - medium straight Race 2 Checa: 300,8 Melandri: 315,1 Sykes: 313,3 In 2011: Philip Island: Checa: 301 Biaggi 318. The difference in topspeed got smaller in 2012 WC 2011: Checa!

Johan Mulder

September 19, 2012 8:58 AM

WSBK » 2011 data little use for Checa in 2012


Yawn... same complaints over and over again... Sure it's frustrating wenn people pass you on the (long) straights, but you don't ever hear them complain about the massive torque difference between the 2 and 4-cylinders. The Ducati catapults itself out of corners, especially the slower ones. You want topspeed? Buy/lease/build a 1000cc 4-cylinder!


Page 3 of 5
« ‹ 1 2 3 4 5  › »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.