Crash.Net User: mcracing

Comments rating: 256
Position in rating: 682

Show Comments on:


February 28, 2010 12:49 PM
Last Edited 87 days ago

WSBK » 'Happy' Haslam breaks victory duck in style

i stayed up all night to watch the (excellent) live eurosport coverage. god was it worth it!! two cracking races and i don't think anyone would have picked the eventual winners. the finish to race 1 was simply edge of your seat. what a great start to the season. folloow that motogp. you may have the technology/budgets and worldwide presige.......WSBK has the racing. :D


February 28, 2010 7:38 PM
Last Edited 2251 days ago

WSBK » 'Happy' Haslam breaks victory duck in style

F**k Ben Spies? That's ridiculous. Are you somehow saying that the exciting racing was 'two fingers up' to The Ben. WSBK has proven once again that it is the best for close racing and excitment, but it is not better off without one of the best superbike (potentially Motogp....we will see) riders out there. Comments like that don't belong on this forum. Get a clue......moron. You're no better than the guys that bash JT every opportunity they get, like they could do any better. :?


November 07, 2009 4:07 PM

MotoGP » Yamaha’s 2009 MotoGP technical presentation.

Did everyone see the interview where Rossi said Yamaha had to choose between him and jorge for 2011 or Ducati would come calling. Think this will happen regardless. Lorenzo will win MotoGp next year. Spies will have his satelite year done and dusted. Rossi off to Ducati 2011 and Spies will replace him in the factory team. Can ducati keep stoner and rossi happy in the same team?.......noone developes a bike like rossi.......bye bye stoner.

Page 11 of 16
« 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.